Some people say that we should use clean energy to protect the environment, while others say that we should use traditional energy source because they are less expensive
Currently, society has witnessed an unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, hence people are attaching more importance to environmental problems. Some individuals reckon that clean energy ought to take the place of traditional energy so as to reduce contamination emitted from the combustion of traditional energy. While others contend that considering the cost of utilizing clean energy, traditional energy is our first choice. Personally speaking, I concur with the first opinion and this can be substantiated as follows.
To start with, the economy can not develop sustainably without the foundation of the environment. Nowadays, excessive construction both in rural and urban areas has given rise to serious pollution, including air pollution, water contamination and so on. Meanwhile, the use of private car or the production run by a bunch of factories also exerts detrimental effects on the well-being of the environment. Due to the listed reason, the environment is deteriorated, which poses a threat to the development of the economy. Concretely, owing to the water pollution intensified by diversified factors, some factories are on the verge of collapse. For instance, it is difficult for the factory producing potable water to make ends meet, since they invest a lot of funds to discover water source while the ever-rising contamination in water resources prevents them from finding a suitable source to maintain production of potable water. This example illuminates that without a well-organized environment, the economy fails to develop in the long run.
What’s more, the investment allocated to purchasing clean energy is a money well spent. Under the circumstance that every country spares no efforts to develop their economy through the exploitation of natural resources, the whole society is running out of the reservation of traditional energy, therefore, apparently, the price of coal or crude oil will continuously increase, which evidently imposes more financial burden on industries. Conversely, since the expensive price of utilizing clean energy is supposed to be ascribed to the developing technology, the cost spent on purchasing clear energy can be largely cut with the advancement of cutting-edge technology. Meanwhile, provided that people continue using traditional energy, a lot of environmental problems will ensue. Therefore, in order to maintain our physical health, we have to expend a large quantity of fund to tackle the emerging problems. The research conducted to evaluate the cost of preventing and addressing these issues demonstrates that people can save lots of money if we start to make full use of clean energy instead of solving the environmental problems resulted from our non-sustainable use of traditional energy.
Admittedly, applying clean energy in diversified industries put a strain on them, however, the disadvantage can be compensated by the great benefits of it.
In a nutshell, since the environment is a solid foundation of developing the economy and distributing fund to clean energy is conducive for future development, we ought to use clean energy to safeguard our mere planet to live.
- Some people say that we should use clean energy to protect the environment, while others say that we should use traditional energy source because they are less expensive 90
- What is the most useful way to help the natural environment?Plant more trees and build parksStores stop providing plastic bagsIncrease access to public transportation to reduce the number of cars on the road 90
- What is the most important factor that affect the lasting time of a friendship?help each other at difficult timehave same intereststrust each other completely 73
- High salaries with high risks of losing a job or a secure job with a low salary 90
- What is the most useful way to help the natural environment?Plant more trees and build parksStores stop providing plastic bagsIncrease access to public transportation to reduce the number of cars on the road 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...to take the place of traditional energy so as to reduce contamination emitted from the c...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2686.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54958677686 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25455657734 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53305785124 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 870.3 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.9030016215 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.368421053 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4736842105 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271199637822 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787441307426 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698820570716 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151120141904 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662350911078 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 11.7677419355 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 58.1214874552 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 86.8835125448 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.