Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why?
Most people agree that the number of beggars has increased dramatically in the last couple of years, and the Coronavirus pandemic has worsened the situation. Personally, I believe that people should not give money to beggars. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, giving money to beggars will never teach them how to be independent and self-sufficient. Usually, beggars ask for money on the streets because they find it easy to get money. They will continue on this way because they find it effortless and profitable. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a student in University, there was a child who used to ask for money on the street. Many students felt sorry about his health conditions, so they usually gave him money. Therefore, this child stayed on the streets for years, asking for money, and he never thought about finding a job and depending on himself. So, giving money to beggars will encourage them to stay on the streets and beg for money all their life.
Furthermore, the increase of beggars' number will increase the crime on the streets. The number of beggars and homeless has rocketed due to the challenging economic situation in the world. This case will enhance the crime on the streets, especially in the big cities. For instance, in the last two years, many people in my country lost their jobs due to the pandemic. This situation forced many people to ask for money on the streets and become homeless. And the one can notice that the crimes from murdering to stealing have risen noticeably in my city.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that it is wrong to give beggars money. This is because of the increase in crime rate on the streets, and giving money to beggars on the streets will never help them be self-sufficient.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-01-27 | nusybah | 60 | view |
2021-06-25 | Ankita@050 | 70 | view |
2021-06-25 | Ankita@050 | 70 | view |
2021-06-25 | Ankita@050 | 70 | view |
2020-12-31 | yokohama | 73 | view |
- Essay topics The emperor Claudius of Rome ruled an empire spanning three continents between 41 and 54 CE His reign was of massive importance to the history of ancient European civilization In fact the emperor was among the most innovative fair and w 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 70
- The Little Ice Age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900C.E.. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scientists have long wondered what ca 60
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78056426332 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63668604218 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473354231975 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0139532131 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.2631578947 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258579023551 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961127151063 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807729096488 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17179289735 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511594769286 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.