Some people think that all school students should learn a foreign language , others , however, think that a student should not be required to learn a foreign language if he or she does not have talent for it.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
With globalization becoming a trend, people see a need to master a foreign language. Being bilingual or even trilingual might help people to be more skilled in their career field. It is believed by a group of people that all school students should learn a foreign language to cope with the trend. However，the opposite idea that there is no need to master a second language also gains some support since what if the student doesn’t have gift for that.
Those who are for that idea definitely have their ground. Mastering a new language enables students to be more competitive in both their career and academic field. Advanced technology and transportation are shrinking the distance between people and different fields. There are more opportunities that practitioner would engage in communicating with or learning from people from other countries who speak a different language. A better language skill would allow workers to have better edge. Students should be always prepared for career.
Some people insist that students should not be required to learn a foreign language if he or she doesn’t have a gift for that. Admittedly, some students are not born to be talented in language. To be more specifical, some students might have some natural deficiency about their tongues. Therefore, they just can’t pronounce well, sometimes even in their native language. There is another case, learning a foreign requires students to memorize tons of words but some students are just not good this even thought they might be excellent in logical reasoning, critical thinking, arithmetical and so on. For those type of students, time arrangement should more shift on the things they are good at instead of learning a language.
Personally, I stand in the middle of the two ideas. A foreign language is of great importance to student nowadays. But a second language acquisition takes a lot of efforts and requires talents, therefore it is more reasonable not to make a second language learning a required course. Letting student to make the option whether or not to learn is a wise choice.
- Many children find it difficult to concentrate on or pay attention to their studies at school What are the causes What are the possible solutions to this problem 56
- Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that all school students should learn a foreign language others however think that a student should not be required to learn a foreign language if he or she does not have talent for it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that government in developing countries should introduce new technologies to people in order to improve the quality of life while others believe that in order to achieve that government should offer free education for all Discuss both th 61
- Some people think that government in developing countries should introduce new technologies to people in order to improve the quality of life while others believe that in order to achieve that government should offer free education for all Discuss both th 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...nguage. There is another case, learning a foreign requires students to memorize tons of w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...rse. Letting student to make the option whether or not to learn is a wise choice.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1166180758 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78481364537 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495626822157 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4583325695 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.75 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.15 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55 5.45110844103 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443094404104 0.236089414692 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141409666583 0.076458572812 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11705994312 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2756112986 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553735886106 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.