Some people think government should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space for example, travelling to moon and other planets. Other people disagree and think government should spend for our basic needs on earth.
Scores of people who live on earth, keep different view towards the fund of government. Some think that government should spend it on human basic needs which are good and extensively imperative for their nation but because of few cases, it is necessary to spend part of the total fund for space travelling to explore moon and other planets. I stand towards the side of spending money on human basic needs probably because of several reasons behind and are recapitulated as below.
For the first reason, isn’t necessary to satisfy basic human needs of every people? Is it easy for the country which has comparatively less amount of fund must have every sectors to be developed? Who claims that only food available left to consume secures good health of people? And who puts his logic forward to state that readily available health post can cure him and supply his hygiene needs instantly? Every country should focus and allocate his fund initially to make healthy life. Nothing is much important than life. After protection of life one should think about other qualitative aspects. There might be scores of issues remaining to solve in the country.
Secondly, for example, discussing about my country having relatively low budgets has compellation of thinking about imminent future. Who has anticipated near future? A country having many rivers and erratic rainfall pattern during particular season always keeps probabilities of flood and landslide. One should think about such disastrous calamities that could occur in future and should spend money for the rescue of human lives.
However, people in these modern days, because of boons of education and interest to explore beyond space are eager to study astronomical subjects. There resides an idea of further surfing to moon and other planets. Not everybody says it a bad idea. If the country is well-off and can supply equipment as well as resources to manufacture at least is a brilliant plan. Everybody will be convinced with the logic of country’s future advancement. Despite tremendous input cost and labor for such mega projects, country’s technology will be flourished excessively.
So, because of several reasons, the issue of spending money in space and moon is not totally good. Whatever and how much benefits can the country have from mega projects, every nation should cogitate over minor human health and basic requirements. Such country whose budget cannot supply and fulfill day to day needs of their citizen keeps serious matter of contemplation. An organized meeting between leaders from various groups is essential to find solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-15 | Subash Devkota | 90 | view |
- A company plans to give money to either improve the environment or promote the arts. Which plan do you think is the better use for the money? Use examples to explain the answer. 76
- A company plans to give money to either improve the environment or promote the arts. Which plan do you think is the better use for the money? Use examples to explain the answer. 88
- Someone you know plans to move to your community. What do you think that person would find pleasant or unpleasant about your community? 3
- Some people think government should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space for example, travelling to moon and other planets. Other people disagree and think government should spend for our basic needs on earth. 90
- A person whose monument you want to build in your country with reasons. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e. Nothing is much important than life. After protection of life one should think abo...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 117, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...n is not totally good. Whatever and how much benefits can the country have from mega...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, at least, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2210.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23696682464 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65650696726 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561611374408 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4137247977 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.88 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350426834694 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790052873892 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100674535961 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191373979673 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117987192828 0.0645574589148 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.