Some people think university professors should spend more time doing research while others think they should spend more time educating students. What is your view?
The teachers play an indispensable role in any nation. they lay the sustainable development foundation of the countries in different facets including economic. Their time scheduling, however, is subjected to the various controversies. A group of people believes that they should spend most of their time on doing research while others believe that increasing the knowledge of students is far important and they should devote most of their time in the class. I adamantly believe that university professors should allocate their time to do research.
First and foremost, it is more advantageous to students if teachers allocate most of their time to conduct researches. We are living in the competitive word that pace of changes is more than any moment in the human history. Accordingly, to keep the pace with latest trends of information, they should stay in their office and study as much as possible. This approach can assist students in different ways. First, they can obtain the newest knowledge from their professor which it would help them in the upper levels of their formative years of education. Considering a master student in the economics, as an example, if he aims to apply in one of the well-known universities in the world, he needs the have a thesis to show his knowledge and background. In the case of using old fashion and second-handed knowledge in it, no university would accept him. Second, having a professor who has up to date information, can enrich his resume because employer prefers to hire someone who is aware of latest trends on technologies and has worked with a teacher who has numerous paper in his field.
More importantly, the ultimate role of a student is to heighten the academic knowledge. Accordingly, the professors should only show them the path and probably solve some of their mistakes and remains are in the students' shoulder. It should be stressed that it is students in the university can use different methods to increase their knowledge including, self-study, using various websites like Coursera and Youtube. Admittedly, using these approaches would decline the need for a professor to teach basic courses in class. When they reach the stage of doing research, now the help of the professor is crucial.
In a nutshell, I subscribe to the idea that university faculties should spend their time as much as possible to do research.this is because it can pave the way of economic to the development and students can gain more information from these kinds of teachers
- you have long been friends with someone, if they do something that you don't like, should you still be friend with him or her? (after edit) 70
- tpo 12 68
- It is not necessary to have access to the Internet to live a full life 77
- tpo 18 75
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ay an indispensable role in any nation. they lay the sustainable development foundat...
^^^^
Line 2, column 254, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
... history. Accordingly, to keep the pace with latest trends of information, they should stay...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 989, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...er prefers to hire someone who is aware of latest trends on technologies and has worked w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, second, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2098.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04326923077 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90045331593 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495192307692 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5474158704 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.421052632 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8947368421 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.94736842105 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277979391328 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855040308572 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899982844509 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194985391873 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799611019801 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.