Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship because being away from people reminds us of how important they are. Others think we should always stay with others to have a good relationship because we can communicate with them more often. What do you think?
In this sophisticated and modern world relationship is one of the significant aspects of the human being’s life. Recently there is a controversial debate among people about the quality of our relationships and how much we should be connected with people for being satisfied in our relationships. As far as I am concerned, there is no doubt that communicating with others should be consistent for a favorable life, the reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated hereunder.
To begin with, communicating more frequently with others not only showing how much is important but also causes high level psychological wellbeing. It goes without saying that, the ancient people had created society because of more being in touch together and that is determined more pleasure and easy life. On the other hand, if we take time with others, we will have a better psychological condition and is avoided to catch diseases like depression and anxiety. Hence, a person who cares to spend time regularly with others is more happiest, socialize, and even more reliable for others, so this is one of the basic aspects of having a wholesome life.
Moreover, interacting pretty often with others generates profound ties. Obviously, this is a vivid issue when a person who cares more and spends time talking and seeing others, makes more strong relationships and can account for them in any trouble or happy moments. In more specific terms, I have a friend from childhood that we are connecting daily. I could trust her to tell my secrets and problems always because I have known her completely during these years. Our valuable time for being together has brought us this intimacy and trustworthy and now we are together in any special event like my brother's wedding or when he lost his father in an accident. This example demonstrates how much spending time with others is a gift to ourselves.
Eventually, taking into account all the aforementioned arguments, spending time with others more often is the best choice for two main reasons. Firstly, they have superior mental health, and secondly, they will experience deep-rooted friendships.
- Patents should play or do homework with children 76
- Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship because being away from people reminds us of how important they are Others think we should always stay with others to have a good relationship because we can communicate wi 76
- It is important to know about the happening of the world 3
- Sometimes people are assigned to work in a group on a project Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The group will be helped more by a person who is willing to do what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists th 70
- Sometimes people are assigned to work in a group on a project Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The group will be helped more by a person who is willing to do what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists th 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 530, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'happiest' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: happiest
... to spend time regularly with others is more happiest, socialize, and even more reliable for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12320916905 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90513327488 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587392550143 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.032474218 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.2 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307261945567 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102991912599 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586938947005 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185033383953 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661969072929 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.