Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship, because being away from people reminds us of how important they are. Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate with them more often. What do you think?
Friendship is one of the most wide spread topic consistently, which you can hear various kinds of viewpoint. While some people think it better to keep their friendship by not connecting each other, most majority of people including me hold the opposite view for the following reasons.
First and foremost, the feeling of distrust and dishonest between individuals can be avoided by communicating frequently, and thus maintain relationship. As is known to all, the longer you lost touch with a person, the less you trust in him or her even you are unconscious of this change in attitude. On the other hand, your friendship will be strengthened provided that you both keep in close touch with one other. For instance, my brother Jason used to keep away from his best friend in order to create himself an image of a valuable mate, avoiding chatting with him in several ways. However, his friend sent him a letter saying he thought Jason was no longer a trustful friend, which made Jason disappointed for a while. Luckily, when they talked about it later and promised to keep in touch as often as possible, they backed to best friends again since they had their mutual trust rebuilt.
Another point worth mentioning is that communicating more often is deductive to deepen a relationship as friends share more. To state it more clearly, to make the conversation more interesting as well as appealing, people definitely have to express something impressing or frustrating that happened to them, which is also called share with each other. During this process, they will know more about the other, having a deeper understanding that can facilitate their relationship emotionally. It is not hard to imagine how sad you will be if your girlfriend decreases the time of your dating, wondering that would actually make you love her more. Nevertheless, your relationship will be strengthened provided that you meet or video-chatting as much as possible.
Admittedly, people tend to miss someone they have seen for a long time, and feel excited to see them again. Nonetheless, willing or not, time is likely to kill almost every emotional feeling which you cannot even realize. Thus, it would not hurt to call your friend after a busy day since its advantages are apparent to all.
To put it into a nutshell, considering the two statements I put above, people are well-advised to have communications frequently with someone they really cherish to maintain their relationship.
- Parents should learn from children 70
- Do you agree or disagree young people should try many different kinds of jobs or career before they decide the long term career of their life 76
- Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than b 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important aspect of a job is the money a person earns Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...posite view for the following reasons. First and foremost, the feeling of distr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, really, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04390243902 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86994414876 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5750978737 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.647058824 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1176470588 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41176470588 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221512776365 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700915967333 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558101299154 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117746165598 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408977850777 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.