Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice

Essay topics:

Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice

These days tourism is more popular than ever, and everyone has their own style of travel. Some people like to take trips alone, while others like to travel with a companion. Personally, I prefer to travel with a partner. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, traveling with a companion is more economical than vacationing alone. As leisure travel has become more and more popular, hotel operators have started to charge increasingly high costs for accommodation. Single occupancy rates are fairly uncommon nowadays, so sharing a room with a friend is a good way to cut costs. Not only that, but people traveling in pairs have better access to package deals on tours, entrance fees, and other activities. My own experience demonstrates some of the financial benefits of vacationing with a friend. When my girlfriend and I traveled together through Peru last year, we were able to rent an entire hotel room for less than the cost of both of us sleeping in a shared dorm. Over the course of our one month trip, we saved several hundred dollars in this way. As a result of saving so much money, we were able to change our plans and extend our trip for almost an entire week. This example demonstrates some of the financial benefits of traveling with a companion.
Moreover, it is much easier to talk to local people when traveling in a pair, and this makes any trip much more rewarding. While a lone stranger can be seen as intimidating, a traveling couple is often considered more approachable. For example, when my girlfriend and I took the aforementioned South American trip last year, we were often welcomed into people’s homes and businesses with open arms. The individuals who invited us often pointed out that they were willing to do so because we looked so happy, friendly and cheerful spending time together. When I traveled by myself in Bolivia a year before I wanted to make similar connections, but I faced a lot of difficulty in doing so. While a single traveler may actually be quite kind and outgoing, this can be somewhat difficult to determine from a distance.
In conclusion, I definitely prefer to travel with a companion rather than alone. This is based on the financial benefits of doing so, and because traveling with a partner makes it easy to interact with local residents.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 Harutyun Aslanyan 60 view
2019-12-27 Majid1369708090 70 view
2019-11-20 graciast 60 view
2019-11-19 kanishkbar4321@gmail.com 85 view
2019-11-19 kanishkbar4321@gmail.com 70 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
These days tourism is more popular than ever, and ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 491, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ivities. My own experience demonstrates some of the financial benefits of vacationing with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 953, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... entire week. This example demonstrates some of the financial benefits of traveling with a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, look, may, moreover, so, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79361179361 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74828437889 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555282555283 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9717136887 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9047619048 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.380952381 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306854192194 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111384398761 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109648131971 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232565381321 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879990680342 0.0645574589148 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.