Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice
Throughout history, people have traveled from their places to other places for some reasons such as working trips or just for entertainment. While some people prefer to travel with other people, others may hold the opposite viewpoint and believe that it is better to go alone. Although the latter has their respectful reasons, I, personally, contend that going with others is a better idea. In the ensuing paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through the two paramount reasons.
First, trips with other people are funnier than when they go alone. To be specific, every person has a special talent, for example, some individuals are good at making jokes, some others are great at some games, or so on. Therefore, when these people with different talents come to each other, they can make more fun in comparison with when a person goes out alone. For instance, when I was at university, my friends and I traveled to the north of Iran, an amazing place in Iran with a sea, jungle, and a variety of restaurants, it was a wonderful trip. On the first day, one of my friends suggested going to the beach for swimming. Then, we went to the beach, and I had not had any experience of swimming in the sea until that day, it was amazing. Moreover, another friend wanted to play the Haftsang game, a traditional game, which is played with at least four people. That time was the first time when I played it, and I really liked it. Thus, had I not gone with my friends on the trip, I would not have had such a wonderful time. That is why I assert that traveling with other persons is better than alone.
Second, people can reduce the cost of trips by traveling with others. In other words, people have to stay in a place such as hotels or houses, or take a car for visiting other places, and so on. When they go with others, the total cost will be divided among them, and consequently, the individual’s cost will be less or at least the same as in compared with when they go alone. For instance, again, when we went to the north of Iran, although we rented a house for five days, took a taxi for going to the beach and back, and ate food in the best restaurants, the cost for each person was low since it was divided among five persons. That is why I contend that being with others on the trips can decrease the cost of them.
To sum up, based on the aforementioned reasons and examples, I believe that people should travel with a companion. Not only does having a companion help to have funnier trips, but it also reduces the cost of the trips.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ific, every person has a special talent, for example, some individuals are good a...
^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me individuals are good at making jokes, some others are great at some games, or ...
^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a, jungle, and a variety of restaurants, it was a wonderful trip. On the first da...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, at least, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48608137045 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44312813669 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464668094218 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7749597354 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7619047619 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2380952381 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.19047619048 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254374226925 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926588791788 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891278944244 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177656180587 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556183515333 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.