Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific examples to support your answers.
Nowadays, youngsters became more motivated to get a valuable education. They have a huge desire to receive appropriate knowledge. The meaning of education differs from one to another. According to me, a lecture that is taken by professors far better than the discussion getting conduct between students. In a lecture, the professor can provide vital materiel and with a huge number of students in the class open discussion might not be a convenient option.
First, the professor gives all the essential information on the lecture, explains different theories, uses specific reasons and examples to clarify the topic. It will give students correct direction. Moreover, students without solid knowledge will not be able to understand and consider the given issue correctly. In addition, sometimes in discussion class, students start discussing the topic then we will not get correct or information regarding the actual topic which students suppose to talk about. For example, I am was enrolled in a sports medicine class, the professor used to address vital information and resources of the information. I gained lots of practical knowledge from that class which might not be possible with the open discussion.
Second, professors need to best utilize the class time where a particular amount of content needs to be delivered to students within a limited amount of time. This comprises the other facts like the size of the class and which particular topic is being taught. For example, during my physical therapy school, we used to sit in a class of sixty students. Discussion among this much high number of students require time, they might fail to cover up their whole syllabus. Moreover, the content of each class is designed as such that required almost the full class time to deliver only. In short, when the number of students is more in class it is not possible to cover the whole topic in time.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that lectures are better than open discussion because it provides concise and essential information in a short period of time by the professor. However, the open discussion might divert lectures on other topics, and it might be not possible with a higher number of students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
... education differs from one to another. According to me, a lecture that is taken by professors ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 522, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...uppose to talk about. For example, I am was enrolled in a sports medicine class, th...
^^^
Line 2, column 540, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ut. For example, I am was enrolled in a sports medicine class, the professor used to a...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...se and essential information in a short period of time by the professor. However, the open dis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10468319559 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71893709035 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2316698338 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5263157895 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324056592672 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095024997994 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581579896595 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197345200904 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247371743849 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.