Arrangements in universities such as how many hours that the libraries should be open or what kind of food should be served in the cafeteria affect students' academic lives as well as their living standards on campus. Some people argue that students should not be involved in making such decisions. On the contrary, experts ought to be hired for the job exclusively. Nevertheless, from my perspective, universities should take opinions from students seriously and allow them to participate in the decision-making process.
On the one hand, contributing to the policy on the campus, students will be more satisfied with their school lives, which will deepen their devotion toward their universities in the meantime. As students own the right to adjust the arrangements, their specific needs are more likely to be met. For instance, when finals are approaching, libraries are often full, with too many students look for places to review their study materials. Under this circumstance, if students can express their needs and universities act accordingly, it would be much easier for students to succeed in their exams.
On the other hand, the services provided by schools will be more efficient if students could access to the decision-making process. If rules are designed based on students' needs, fewer resources would be wasted on services that are not attractive to students. For example, if the food sold in the cafeteria are popular among students, the revenues will be high, and less food will be thrown away because of spoiling. Only when the policymakers take the voice of students seriously could they succeed in making decisions.
Admittedly, asking students to make decisions tend to cost extra time and energy for both students and universities, since opinions need to be collected and analyzed. However, the pay-off for such conducts will bypass the costs generated from gathering information. For instance, a simple questionnaire will help universities make course arrangement according to students' intentions for taking different courses. Otherwise, it would cost schools a significant amount of money if many classes are signed up by only a few students.
In summary, it is wise to allow students to play a role in making decisions about issues that affect the daily life of everyone on campus because that students will live a smoother experience, that the policy will be more efficient, and that the benefits of allowing students to participate well exceed the costs.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Some people prefer to buy technological devices as soon as they are available to the public. Others people prefer to wait until many people have used them. Which do you prefer? 71
- Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want.Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite. What's your opinion? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One can learn a lot about a person from the type of friends this person has. 73
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some un 73
- Do you agree or disagree: In order to succeed in study or job，the ability to adjust or adapt to changing condition or circumstance is more important than having knowledge. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s are signed up by only a few students. In summary, it is wise to allow students...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, in summary, kind of, such as, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25628140704 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92568493391 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51256281407 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.254549989 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.058823529 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4117647059 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64705882353 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335032193111 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115008544751 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101386951866 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20403549683 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125542818805 0.0645574589148 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.