At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some universities, experts are hired to make these decisions, and students are almost never involved. Which approach do you prefer and why?
The question is whether the university should allow students to make decision about university’s issues or it should be better to hire experts in every field. Everyone with regard to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however I am inclined to declare that students with participating in such activities can take advantage from this situation. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore them in following essay for strengthening my vantage point:
To begin with, nobody could overlook the fact that the university plays a pivotal role in students' life and future. It goes without saying that universities not only help education system, but also they create a bed for students to form their personality. Cooperation and participation in such miscellaneous activities like making decision about food or the hours that the libraries would be open and so on, will cause the young to improve knowledge base in every field. One should not forget that nowadays gaining diverse experiences and being up-dated is vital because people need to keep up themselves with such a technology-driven world; consequently, this opportunity gives a chance to young students to broaden the scope of their knowledge. I remember, last year my university made a decision to eliminate some rules. Based on one of these rules, the staff did not have to guide new students in campus because they did not have enough time for this; subsequently students like me, had to do this task. It was very practical. We could provide some worthwhile information about campus and dormitory's life for new students that experts were not able to do that.
The second reason for my arguments lies the reality that one of the biggest challenges for students is that they need to make friends for themselves or even more the university's life requires students to learn group- work. One of the striking factors in the success of the societies is collaboration among people. If human beings are not instructed this factor, definitely countries will not be prosperous. To elucidate, take Japan. Since students learn to participate in school's activities or university, this country has been set above list of developed-countries. One should notice that working in the group provides a circumstance for students to debate with each other and as a result the best friendships will be created.
As I have illustrated, I am strongly concurred with this mentioned approach because it can give a sense of independence and responsible to students; hence, they will be able to shape their personality.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Younger school children (ages five to ten) should be required to study art and music in addition to math, science, history and language. 90
- tpo24 80
- tpo16 85
- do you agree or disagree?playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 84
- tpo24 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to group'
Suggestion: to group
...ersitys life requires students to learn group- work. One of the striking factors in t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, look, second, so, then, while, i feel, as a result, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14319248826 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02253451849 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565727699531 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4947671519 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.882352941 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0588235294 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223432213208 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728448772586 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588259724353 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130689386044 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622391638245 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.