In order to progress and compete in today's modern world, each person strives to accomplish each task, in the correct path to achieve his purposes, along numerous beneficial effects. Sometimes people encounter an unexpected problem during their work, which seems to bring a negative impact for their lives. However, the final result is satisfactory. Personally, I have a memory of same situation from my childhood, which I had to make a handicraft for my chemistry class.
There was a special contest between a considerable numbers of schools, and students had to make a specific handicraft which is related to one of their chemistry lessons. Authorities would give scores for students' innovation, accuracy and their ability to turn in a neat handicraft. After many hours thinking about various ideas for making as my own handicraft, I decided to make a system which could depict the chemical structure of water (H2O) in a large scale by colorful shadows. Therefore I started my work by providing colorful papers, a lamp, some wire and a bulky black box. I spent more than 1 week for completing this work. Eventually, I made an instrument, which could display a large colorful photograph of H2O, on a rather big curtain which was in front of a black box and each color had special defining.
In the match day, at first hours of the commencement of match, I felt happy, because I was sure that I would win over. But, as time went by, I faced with various handicrafts, in which complex materials had been used. Therefore I yielded that I could not be a winner. In my instrument, the simplest materials had been used. And even I decided to leave the salon.
Authorities would display the scores two days later. Although, I felt sorrow and I did not have any desire to be a winner, I checked the results. I was really surprised when results showed that I prospered and became the first winner.
To sum up, throughout the world, it is possible for all individuals to encounter the positions which are out of their anticipation. Chemistry match was a perfect kind of this situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...O in a large scale by colorful shadows. Therefore I started my work by providing colorful...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... which complex materials had been used. Therefore I yielded that I could not be a winner....
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, really, so, therefore, as for, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82681564246 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79315083421 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572625698324 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6492698839 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0639240125848 0.236089414692 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0176020150899 0.076458572812 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290461216689 0.0737576698707 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0354252539833 0.150856017488 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162305259109 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.