Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.
It goes without saying that not every group of people can be successful, which is mostly attributed to how the opinions of members are taken into account. It is my firm conviction that members who are eager to accomplish whatever other members want can help the group profoundly, whereas counter-arguments still exist. In what follows, I will thoroughly elucidate what rationale my perspective is based on.
To begin with, given that people are most engaged in tasks they feel are theirs, letting other members opinions be implemented can improve the overall progress of the group. This is because they will try their best to be involved in the tasks, and as a result they will be more incentivized to accomplish their duties. Accordingly, should all the members get motivated to do well in the group, the group can reach its goals more rapidly and efficiently without leaving any doubt. On the other hand, if members confront strong oppositions, it will throw a wrench in the works and even fundamental tasks in the group will be kept in check.
The second pivotal reason lies in the fact that when people in a group see that their desires and ideas are taking into account, they feel being valuable and trusted. Hence it can provoke a convivial atmosphere among the group members, which in turn eliminates any further conflicts. Apparently, a good vibe inside a group drives the tasks forward and boosts the members' voyage toward their destination and purpose. Otherwise, usually a discontent arises in the group; the dissenting voice, consequently, will grow louder and every one in the group will be dissatisfied with the circumstance. If not for considering other members and performing as they wanted, our robotics group in university, would have faced a serious conflict which obviously would have led to group disintegration.
Long story short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that doing other members wants in a group is a prudent course of action. Not only does it help the group members to work more effectively, but also it will put a curb on future dissatisfactions. That every member in a group, espcially new ones, do other members desires and opinions is highly recommended.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-27 | zahra.tmmm | 80 | view |
| 2017-08-22 | fereshtehRR | 65 | view |
- purpose of the cave paintings of Lascaux 73
- tpo 49: whales navigation by stars 80
- sea otter population decrease 83
- Amtrak intercity train service 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
..., they feel being valuable and trusted. Hence it can provoke a convivial atmosphere a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, second, so, still, well, whereas, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0027027027 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85830585221 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548648648649 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6112698408 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.4 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434779888136 0.236089414692 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155098967715 0.076458572812 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675429164788 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283446542761 0.150856017488 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453820203505 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.