For the students ages 5 10 it is better to take a break for every one hour of instruction or let them to focus on lessons for a longer period of time

Essay topics:

For the students (ages 5-10), it is better to take a break for every one ‎hour of instruction or let them to focus on lessons for a longer period ‎of time.‎

Without a shadow of doubt, breaks can have a prominent role in every child’s learning ‎efficiency. Some people are proponents of the claim that children should not have a break ‎frequently and should concentrate on the class materials for a longer period of time; ‎however, others hold the opposite perspective and believe that they should take a break ‎more frequently to be able to focus better in the class. The idea to which I subscribe is the ‎latter one. My viewpoint is based on quite a few reasons, two compelling ones of which have ‎been elaborated upon hereunder.‎

The first vital point to bear in mind is that studying for a longer period of time can ‎potentially diminish the quality of study sessions. When children study, it is of the likelihood ‎that their concentration would decrease as they put more time to study a lesson. As a result, ‎it can waste their time and efforts, for they would lack focus. In other words, the more ‎they study, the more chance to lose productivity. My own experience is a good example of ‎this matter. I used to attend a school, in which the rule was that we could take a break ‎every two hours. I never forget that in the last thirty minutes of every session, I and my ‎classmates were basically killing time, as we were extremely exhausted and could not focus ‎on the lesson that was tutored in the class.‎

The second noteworthy reason is that it is more likely that children might lose their ‎enthusiasm towards a lesson while being exposed to the lesson for a long time. As human ‎beings, as long as something is intriguing for us, we tend to perform that task, in the best ‎way possible. Moreover, if we lose our interest in the mentioned task, we would not be ‎able to execute the task in the most efficient way, as we would lack interest. As a result, we ‎should keep in mind that students should have adequate breaks, in order to stay passionate ‎about the lesson they are studying. Furthermore, it is plausible that students would be ‎reluctant to study certain lessons because of the fact that they were overwhelmed by that ‎lesson before which can lead them not to nurture their talents. A friend of mine, who used ‎to be my classmate in primary school, is a case in point. He used to be well-known in our ‎school, for his exceptional aptitude and interest in math. As a consequent, his parents hired ‎a famous mathematics teacher for him to educate him in a profound way. But unbelievably, ‎he ended up hating math as he declared that his teacher gave him breaks every two hours ‎and he was always tired of math. Had his teacher given him breaks more often, he might not have ‎eventually despised math like that.‎

Had his tutors given him more breaks to relax, he might not have eventually despised math like that.‎

In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that it is better for ‎children to have break times more often, as it can help them to focus more on class ‎materials and they would not end up exhausted from a specific lesson. ‎

Votes
Average: 8.9 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-27 shahabaddin_solaimanian 89 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ate on the class materials for a longer period of time; ‎however, others hold the opposite per...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...r in mind is that studying for a longer period of time can ‎potentially diminish the quality o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 671, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
... be ‎reluctant to study certain lessons because of the fact that they were overwhelmed by that ‎lesson b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1057, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a profound way" with adverb for "profound"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hematics teacher for him to educate him in a profound way. But unbelievably, ‎he ended up hating ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, in short, as a result, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2572.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 540.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76296296296 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75248422523 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 771.3 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.217635797 48.9658058833 229% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.368421053 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4210526316 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280035673512 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812583236686 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609299045755 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160072698987 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690991677443 0.0645574589148 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.