students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking the notes or communicating and sharing ideas with classes. which one is better?
The question is that students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking the notes or communicating and sharing ideas with classes. Everyone with regard to his personality and his private viewpoint can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however I am inclined to affirm that the second way can be a useful selection. Participating in the discussions of class can provide some advantages for students in their current and future life. My arguments and reasons are listed below which strengthen my point of view:
To begin with, it is axiomatic that sitting and taking note continuously can be tedious for everyone; hence a worthwhile solution for avoiding from this circumstance is that teachers require students to be active in the class. A teacher should not forget that when students with different backgrounds share their opinions, spontaneously the level of knowledge will be raised up in the class. Such a condition will cause students to affect on each other’s ideas; as a result the creative and objective ideas will be formed.
The second reason why I advocate from communicating students in a class with each other lies in the fact interpersonal skills. This approach can improve the students' personality. For instance, the shy students can use this opportunity for optimizing their character and overcoming on their fears; consequently the self-confidence feeling will be reinforced in them. Also speaking in the class helps students to make new friends for themselves.
Moreover, there is a bit of different point here. When teachers allow students to participate in the discussions, the competition can enter to the scene. Nobody could overlook this fact that the competition plays a crucial role in obtaining prosperity; subsequently the students will do more efforts for attracting their teachers or at least showing off.
By taking all above mentioned arguments this conclusion could be drawn that participation and
Cooperation provides an advantageous bed for both of the students and teachers. Broadening knowledge base, gaining self-confidence feeling and creating competition among students are some achievements in this way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-06 | peerless alex | 85 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 76
- do you agree or disagree? hether all university students should take basic science courses regardless of their field study. 90
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 74
- do you agree or disagree?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 76
- Tpo46 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...Such a condition will cause students to affect on each other's ideas; as a result th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...l skills. This approach can improve the students personality. For instance, the shy stud...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nce feeling will be reinforced in them. Also speaking in the class helps students to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, while, at least, for instance, as a result, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44347826087 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0841941781 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559420289855 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0352680603 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.2 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 5.45110844103 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2764800514 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109265613457 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190871177534 0.0737576698707 259% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132135102743 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113023191691 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.