A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than
excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
We live in an era where one keeps his respect and their ego more than anything that is a person who is respected gets its respect back. Moreover, a person interacts with people who are friendly with them. In my opinion, the statement that "A teacher's ability to relate well with the students is more important than excellent knowledge oh the subject being taught." is true. A teacher who interacts well with their students has the best abilities to make her students and her career a success. In the following essay I would like to give some reasons in support of my answer.
To begin with, I think a teacher who relates well with her students not only gains a lot of respect from her students but her students love to be present in her class. A teacher who just enters in the class without even interacting with the students will create a boring environment for her students. A teacher who explains her students the topics by giving good examples and in more funny way will make a bond with her students. This would make a good environment for the students as well as for the teacher. For instance, when I was in fifth grade I had my math teacher who interacted with her students not only for the academic purposes but also if a student had any problem in their personal lives or anywhere. When she entered the class she used to give us a brief explanation of the topic by giving us kinds of examples. Moreover, she also praised and rewarded the students who scored well in the class. By this way, students were more attentive in the class and worked harder to get rewarded. She also did not discourage the students who were not good in studies but motivated them to do well. In this way she not only made the class more entertaining but by her friendly nature she made her students to be more attentive during the class.
The second reason that I would give in support of my opinion is that, some teachers like to be more disciplined in the class which means that according to them being more interactive with the students divert their focus from the studies. The students rather want to enjoy and do different activities than study. In their view, the main purpose of a teacher is to express their most knowledge without making sure that whether their students understand or no. This makes the lecture boring. The teacher who is strict makes the student to hesitate and ask questions during the lecture. For example, my younger brother is in grade ten. His english teacher is very disciplined and does not like her students to interrupt her during the class. My brother said that she also scolds the students who do not do well and cares only about her lecture. My brother explained that the most students do not understand to what is taught in the class but everybody hesitates to ask her. furthermore, the students are not serious during her lecture. Being a teacher with excellent knowledge but with the ability to relate to the student's not only diverts the students focus but also shows disrespect to the teacher.
To weigh both the sides of the argument I would prefer a teacher with the ability to relate with their students which would benefit both the teacher and the student rather being a teacher with the knowledge but being disrespected by the students.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important thanexcellent knowledge of the subject being taught.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Internet is the source from where we can get information in the world. Whether to use internet in a useful way or to create problems for future totally depends from person to person. The statement that “some people think that internet provides us with v 73
- some people think that educational programs are best understood when listened on the radios while others think it's better to watch these program on television. In you opinion , which is the best way to learn from this program,television or radio? Us 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... my opinion, the statement that 'A teachers ability to relate well with the student...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 715, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...em in their personal lives or anywhere. When she entered the class she used to give ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 970, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ass but everybody hesitates to ask her. furthermore, the students are not serious during he...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, well, as for, for example, for instance, i think, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2700.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 583.0 407.700716846 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63121783877 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91379618374 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44150246877 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.382504288165 0.524837075471 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 824.4 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7082452951 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5925925926 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18518518519 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348847493025 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112267971881 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102963466299 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267980364761 0.150856017488 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606416283326 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.