Many people have a strong will to persuade others to believe their social or political view. They always debate with others in anywhere, anytime. However, some of them are teachers. With spreading their view in the classroom, they can making presentation in their class, because it can satisfy their will to pursuade. However, I insist the opinion that teacher should not making their social or political views known to student in th classroom.
Firstly, making their political view public may cause some student's unsatisfy. If a student's father, or his/her close relationship peer, even himself/herself is a big fan of a party, there might happens worse things. For example, If the teacher states that he very hate a specific party's policy, or the party itself, he might abuse the party without re-consideration in the class. Obviously, it can irritate the party's advocator, because it can be seen as an abuse to themselves. The result is, however, such party's crazy fan might convene a collection to protest their political or social views. It will harm the reputation of the school because it is a scandal of such kind of teacher, as well as the life of the teacher, for he might not able to be a teacher anymore. So, In order to protect himself, as a teacher, he is better to not make him policy view public.
Secondly, teacher's policy view might not suitable in morden society, for his view haven't be checked by anyone. A teacher might hold a anachronistic view, such as nazi and dictatorship. If a teacher output his view, with a group of student support him, it might cause another terrible result. For example, they might orgnize a group, with spporting group's member and exclude others, making the school system cannot work well. In such a group, if any member be bullied by others, others might take adventure to fight back. Then, it will become a riot, without rules, without police, just fight with others, which will not be a happy ending to anyone. So, in order to make the school peace and love, teacher should not public his unchecked social view.
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 60
- transient lunar phenomena 3
- Do you agree or disagree The rapid growth of cities has a mostly positive impact on the development of the society 70
- TPO 33 Integrated Writing Task 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...g their view in the classroom, they can making presentation in their class, because it...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...ist the opinion that teacher should not making their social or political views known t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...uitable in morden society, for his view havent be checked by anyone. A teacher might h...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...checked by anyone. A teacher might hold a anachronistic view, such as nazi and di...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83098591549 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56354433773 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498591549296 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6363969862 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2631578947 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6842105263 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429482043407 0.236089414692 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144490719113 0.076458572812 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173314128708 0.0737576698707 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321016769245 0.150856017488 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14552395947 0.0645574589148 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.