Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Many people believe that teachers should not make their social and political views known to students in the classroom while others thinks informing this knowledge to students is suitable for them. As far as I am concerned, teacher should tell their social and political knowledge to students in the class room because not only does it help them to broaden their mind, but also it increase their knowledge.
The first aspect to point out is that learning social and political views, help students to broaden their mind. students by learning skills in university can enhance their perspective and broaden their mind and thoughts. For example, a teacher that passes his political views to his student, helps him to understand subjects better and think about every matter carefully before making irrational decision. So by this ways teachers help student to build a great life in the future. Consider that a teachers do not informs this views to his students. In that point students miss their chance to learn new thing and make their mind effective and obtain a great perspective.
Another reason worth mentioning is that students improve their knowledge in other field. Nowadays in every society there is a unavoidable subject that emphasize on knowledge on students in schools or university. In this modern world that technology developes very fast and all field are connected to each other, students should enhance their knowledge in every area. For instance, a civil engineer that design building can conclude a better decision by learning the use of computer engineering in civil field and this lead to a better future life.
To summarize, due to the fact that learning social or political veiws broaden students mind and increase their knowledge it is a subtle point that teachers make their social or political veiws known to students in the classroom.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...them to broaden their mind, but also it increase their knowledge. The first aspect to p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
...s, help students to broaden their mind. students by learning skills in university can en...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 412, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...efore making irrational decision. So by this ways teachers help student to build a g...
^^^^
Line 2, column 495, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a teacher' or simply 'teachers'?
Suggestion: a teacher; teachers
...great life in the future. Consider that a teachers do not informs this views to his studen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 513, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'inform'?
Suggestion: inform
...future. Consider that a teachers do not informs this views to his students. In that poi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eld. Nowadays in every society there is a unavoidable subject that emphasize on k...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09836065574 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54539859703 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501639344262 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2468212321 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.615384615 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.532765594845 0.236089414692 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20472619781 0.076458572812 268% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160468564474 0.0737576698707 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.383982727861 0.150856017488 255% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176391881432 0.0645574589148 273% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.