Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Nowadays, there are more arguments on the value brought by the teachers. I agree that teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays because of the following reasons.
Firstly, there are many alternatives which can also teach children. In the past, learning from teachers is the only way for children to gain some knowledge. However, with the development of technology, there are some machines and electronic devices which can teach children online. For example, the robot can help children practice English and teach children how to read a book. As a result, there are some extra resources for children to get new information, leading to the decreasing value of teachers.
Secondly, the role of teacher changed a lot from past to now. For example, in China, we traditionally required children to respect the teachers strictly and to follow what the teacher said. Kong Zi, which is one of the greatest Chinese masters, taught us that we should respect our teachers. But currently, children are encouraged to challenge the teacher and take teacher as friends so that they can get more useful knowledge instead of only the knowledge required by the textbook. The traditional thinking has already lost in some kind of the situations because people tend to focus on the interaction between students and teachers.
Finally, as the parents become more knowledgable, there are more education made by parents recently. Teacher become a minor role in children's education. In addition, parents are the best role to teach their kid how to become a person when their kid is in the early age. For example, parents are responsible to teach their kid to be honest to his or her friends, which cannot be replaced by teachers. Luckily, parents get more educations than parents in the past. In the end, they can become well prepared to educate the children by themselves.
In conclusion, I think teachers play a more modern role in the society which is that they lead the children to learn rather than only to teach children what the knowledge itself is. Compared to the past, children can choose more options to learn and improve themselves in multiple ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | nusybah | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | nusybah | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | mazenghonem | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Sarrraaa | 68 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of 76
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to th 80
- The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake. The level of salt in the lake’s water—what scientists call its salinity—has been increasing steadily for years because the lake’s water is evaporating faster than it is being replaced b 76
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 76
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02732240437 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65513749992 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478142076503 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4145359453 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307737390676 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104452049428 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139937220707 0.0737576698707 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239243441881 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.223211474645 0.0645574589148 346% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.