Teachers were more valued and appreciated in the past more than today.
Since the dawn of education and building schools, parents and students had been valued teacher and their job. On the other hand, nowadays, people forget the ethic of paying respect to educators. I strongly believe that in the past people more appreciated teachers rather than present time. I have at least two reasons to explain my point of view.
First, making progress in technology and invention of computer make process of learning much more comfort than before. Moreover, people no longer need to attend to schools and learn from traditional school. Owing to render new way for education, we can infer that people do not pay a heed to teachers in order to appreciate their position and career. As an explicit example, some video games and fun program can take the position of teacher for student, so parents prefer to provide home schooling for their children. It is convincing that parents can take advantage of this way by reducing cost of commuting to school and preventing to pay tuition fee and other costs pertaining to schooling. This line of thought brings about deficit attention to teachers and reduce thankfulness towards them.
Second, by enhancing the number of universities, more student can attend to universities and become teacher. In contrast, in the past, there were a few prominent teachers whom all individuals know. By means of being well known, all parents and students were compelled to appreciate those teachers. In addition, to have high score student had to work hard to get high rank in the sight of their teacher. For instance, when I was in high school, in order to pass my final exam and go through university, I needed to take some courses. All students in my city either had to take this course by one teacher the only teacher all over our province in the past years. Once, there was no way unless being punctual in attendance to school. As a result, we paid respect to our teacher and tried to make sure he was satisfied of our manner because there was no other choice for having a math teacher in our city. Had we have other math instructor throughout our province, we would never have appreciated him that much.
In conclusion, in the past, people because of some reasons like lack of teachers in their cities had to pay respect to their teachers. Besides, nowadays, advancing in technology makes prevalent home schooling and studying far from school which not only reduces gratitude towards teachers, but also provides self-studying for students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-14 | Vivian Chang | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Crash | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | can111 | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | minammah | 73 | view |
- rights of animal 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- agree or disagreegetting a job by the influence of others 76
- advantages and disadvantages of free health care 85
- Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 662, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Once” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ll over our province in the past years. Once, there was no way unless being punctual...
^^^^
Line 5, column 910, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[4]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ving a math teacher in our city. Had we have other math instructor throughout our pr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, moreover, second, so, well, at least, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91016548463 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59186195247 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539007092199 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8083206485 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9047619048 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228668175883 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720694778617 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892881245058 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144435494516 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074760736718 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.