Technology has changed the way we communicate, but not for the better. Do you agree or disagree?
By an inventions of new developed methods including an internet or a cell phone, there were a high price communications such as using animals, letters, vehicles which carrying packages and their coverings. So, our era's ways more effective than before.
Let's think the past methods such as using pets, birds, letters. All of these ways had been used until mid of the twentieth century, and they have some difficulties, their ways have more risky factors than later methods. Then, their messages and communication issues go their targets ordinarily and slowly. For example, in western states of USA, there would be so many the postal vehicle which used by people for their travels and journeys, all of these horse cars usually gone in hard roads where bad people live and hunt.
Also, after new vehicles and tools discovered, there would be new effective options such as the internet, a mobile phone, the fast trains, planes which used by sending people's posts and their packets. All these tools and materials which people use would explored in need, and they would build and developed for people's necessities. For example, in some places where people work and study, there would be several duties and assignments done by people for their goals and plans. And, all these works and their owners race with time, they always would like to gain good result, in these situation there would some problems which caused by surroundings or their methods. For reaching their targets they should use these new tools because all of them run quickly, perfectly and secure for their purposes. For example, thinking computer companies, all kinds of these companies always use internet and software applications in their working environments, and they use sending method for their files to send their clients. Although, there are any other methods such as using cd, floppy disk, they use the internet technologies for definite solution.
In conclusion, taking account of all above reasons and examples, I definitely do not agree that statement the past methods are not productive today's methods. I thingk that the new explorations are the best ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Harutyun Aslanyan | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | farzaddanaei | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | farzaddanaei | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | Pandalove | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Majid1369708090 | 76 | view |
- Why go to university? 76
- Some people like to buy books to read others like to borrow books from libraries or from other people Compare the advantages of these two ways of reading Which do you prefer Why 83
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? 76
- TPO-31: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an invention' or simply 'inventions'?
Suggestion: an invention; inventions
By an inventions of new developed methods including an i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...s ways more effective than before. Lets think the past methods such as using pe...
^^^^
Line 9, column 255, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'explore'
Suggestion: explore
...ls and materials which people use would explored in need, and they would build and devel...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 537, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'would' and 'like'.
Suggestion: would always like
...s and their owners race with time, they always would like to gain good result, in these situation...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 579, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this situation' or 'these situations'?
Suggestion: this situation; these situations
...ways would like to gain good result, in these situation there would some problems which caused ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13428571429 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4811271303 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545714285714 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5113164675 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.8 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0889170348837 0.236089414692 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369649235657 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319806035778 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0579046455807 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180387465609 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.