Communication between two people who are distant from each other has become easier than ever with the creation of mobile phones. It is each user's preference whether to speak or type to the other person. In my opinion, voice call is the more robust way to communicate from afar. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will develop in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, phone calls are closer to head to head talks than messages, which improves understanding between people. More specifically, only through voice can one feel the speaker's intonation and emotions, which are important information to know what each other is feeling. My personal example is a compelling example of this. Last year, I was texting with my teacher about my scores at school since we could not meet during the pandemic. When she told me how bad my performance was, I though she was just exaggerating it, as she usually do and did not take it too seriously. It turns out I was actually in trouble and it brought me a lot of hassle to make up for the low scores. If I had talked to her, I would have understood that she was being sober about my problems and prevented miscommunication.
On top of that, it is much faster to speak through the phone as opposed to messaging. What I mean is that, talking in real time is the quickest way to communicate, since it does not require typing at all. It can be extremely time wasting and even frustrating to text with someone who type slowly. Drawing from my own experience, this problem most often happen with the elderly. When my grandfather first learned to use a phone, I had to wait a very long time for his reply if I wanted to tell him something through messages. As a result, now I call him if I wanted to tell him something even if there is not that much to say. Phone calls clearly helped me save a lot of time with my grandfather.
In conclusion, I believe that calling is more convenient than texting when it comes to communicating at different locations. This is because it greatly reduces the odds of misunderstanding and is more time-efficient.
- Some people think that parents should plan their children s leisure time carefully Other people believe Those children should decide for themselves how to spend their free time which idea do you agree with 70
- Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other Some people prefer to talk over the phone while others prefer to communicate through text messages What type of communication do you prefer and why 70
- Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other Some people prefer to talk over the phone while others prefer to communicate through text messages What type of communication do you prefer and why 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'users'' or 'user's'?
Suggestion: users'; user's
...e creation of mobile phones. It is each users preference whether to speak or type to ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to head'.
Suggestion: to head
... To begin with, phone calls are closer to head to head talks than messages, which improves und...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: head-to-head
...o begin with, phone calls are closer to head to head talks than messages, which improves und...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...ly, only through voice can one feel the speakers intonation and emotions, which are impo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...as just exaggerating it, as she usually do and did not take it too seriously. It t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, so, i feel, i mean, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58133333333 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81180242707 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1725504876 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.9 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215579126722 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603375875491 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637761411717 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130906259322 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858026390349 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.