Think critically about the following statement. A universal language should replace all languages. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a universal language.
Speaking languages is the main way for human to communicate each other. No one could believe how many kinds of languages are spoken currently in the world. Sometimes, we think how perfect would be having a universal language. It could bring countless advantages to people’s life. The deterrent of the idiom would not be a problem anymore. Otherwise, I thing we would be throwing out part of our history.
Having a universal language solves a lot of issues. The idiom’s barrier would be broke. Meeting people from the other side of the world would be easier. Visiting a different country and talking with the citizens would not be uncomfortable because we would understand each other. For getting a job or studying in a different town we would not need to take an idiom’s course and books and information would be accessible in a single language.
On the other hand, we would be losing our identity. Just thinking how would be our world without the French language, famed by its romanticism is terrified. Every town in the world is featured by their citizen’s dialect. Throwing away the different languages in the world is like we are throwing out our traditions or part of our culture that identify us as human being.
To sum up, despite all the advantages of having a universal language we cannot just obliterate our identity. Many years of human evolutional process have cost to create our parlance that makes us to be what we are. Chinese, Hispanic, Italian, Frenchman, British or Brazilian people; all of them are identify mainly by one thing, their idiom.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: YOU_THING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'think' or 'thinks'?
Suggestion: think; thinks
... not be a problem anymore. Otherwise, I thing we would be throwing out part of our hi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'identified'.
Suggestion: identified
...sh or Brazilian people; all of them are identify mainly by one thing, their idiom.
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'so', 'to sum up', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.188552188552 0.229887763892 82% => OK
Verbs: 0.178451178451 0.158761421928 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104377104377 0.0866891130778 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.040404040404 0.046263068375 87% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0774410774411 0.0685040099705 113% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0942760942761 0.118717715034 79% => OK
Participles: 0.0673400673401 0.0351676179071 191% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.7212205811 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.020202020202 0.0309702414327 65% => OK
Particles: 0.00673400673401 0.00188951952338 356% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0976430976431 0.0887237588012 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.047138047138 0.0209618222197 225% => Try to use less modal verbs (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.020202020202 0.0139019557991 145% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1577.0 2387.08602151 66% => OK
No of words: 267.0 408.028673835 65% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9063670412 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.48200974243 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.352059925094 0.338922669872 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.277153558052 0.251872472559 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.213483146067 0.174417080927 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142322097378 0.112833075102 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7212205811 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546816479401 0.524397521467 104% => OK
Word variations: 54.4608648675 59.2087087015 92% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6684587814 87% => OK
Sentence length: 14.8333333333 20.5533526081 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7184203956 48.84282405 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6111111111 120.699889404 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8333333333 20.5533526081 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 0.644075263715 35% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 42.5486891386 45.7405998639 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.18181818182 1.45489161554 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263111937091 0.300154397459 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.105912880826 0.103427244359 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0703396681223 0.0752933317313 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.486225555621 0.497263757937 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126610332604 0.151897553556 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108823420638 0.114077575197 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693261833936 0.0781384742642 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.335312853318 0.336927656856 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.082193198658 0.067059652881 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188225671212 0.210909579961 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331221981863 0.0618886996521 54% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 73 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 22 Out of 30