Needless to say, working is an unavoidable part of every human life. Hence, since time immemorial, an inevitable question which always has been such a hot matter of debate is whether it is more efficient to work quickly with low accuracy or work slowly and meticulously meaning with the highest possible precision. Although some people think that todays, working quickly, even with low accuracy, is more essential, I believe otherwise, maintaining that one has to work with proper pace and highest precision, especially in sophisticated today's world. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to subtantiate my perspective.
Without a doubt, the most consequential reason in this regard is that extensiveness of the market in every jobs. Nowadays, evey jobs has so many opponents who offers the same services. If people want to survive in today's markets, they must be able to compete with their counterparts. One of the most significant context of competition is the accuracy and the quality of the offered services. A company may offer high quality products in low pace and high cost, but still keeps its costumers satisfied. However, offering faulty products, which usually are the result of working quickly and without adequate precision, never provide the opportunity for that company to thrive and prosper. Therefore, this reason clearly manifests the impotance working slowly and correctly.
Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, there is another remarbable point deserving some words here which is concerned with money. It is undeiable that the money is the most important factor to every enterprises and jobs. When a company works with high accuracy, it has no choice but to work slowly. During the early years, it may not be able to sell so many products or make adequate contracts with clients; consequently, it can not gain satisfying amount of money. Nonetheless, in the long run, thanks to the high quality of their products, they will have permanent constumers, and not only will it compensate the shortage of money acquisition during the early years, but it also will make more money than their rivals.
All in all, many people are in favor of working quickly and carelessly; nevertheless, the foregoing reasons lead us to the conclusion that the precision and the quality of the output is much more momentous than the pace of the working. This is because of the survival in the market and making money.
- Claim Colleges and universities should specify all required courses and eliminate elective courses in order to provide clear guidance for students Reason College students like people prefer to follow directions rather than make their own decisions
- The zebra mussel a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stopped and that it poses a seriou 80
- Populations of the yellow cedar a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America have been steadily declining for more than a century now since about 1880 Scientists have advanced several hypotheses explain this decline One hypothesis i 73
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues because in fossils the animals living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals Thus scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70 millio
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09290953545 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75323645438 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523227383863 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7195688391 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.722222222 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7222222222 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237020637316 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067052821734 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594212675354 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146324174084 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045916978357 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.