TOP29
The readind and the listening are both about migration of an distincted big size animal, named edmontosaurs, in the winter time of it's habitat. Whereas the penman of the text argues that there are reasons to support this migration, the orator believes that the provided reasons are not convincing. moreover, the lecturer offers 3 theories to challenge the main points made in the reading.
First of all, the author states that this special type of dinosaur migrated to south to have a suitable diet by the plants. In contrast, the lecturer views this issue from an opposite angle. Furthermore, she says that the living place of the edmontosaurs was warmer than today. Thus, North Slope was a proper place to plants to grow widely and being available until the winter time as a dead plant.
The second provided by the author of the passage is about the discovered skeletons from the same place which is a normal goal of migration for animals today. Conversely, the speaker claims that the other animals in these days going to that place due to protection from predators.
Finally, the writer of the reading passage believes that the edmonotsaurs were capable to migrate because of the ability to run fast. On the other hand, the professor suggests that if the adult animal was fast enough for a migration, What about the kids? moreover, she illustrates that the tiny animal was not able to survive alone in the place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | jeffhjz | 3 | view |
| 2014-10-30 | aminsalehi | 70 | view |
- TPO 36: Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO 47 66
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways, or on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons to develop your essay. 73
- TPO 29 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e listening are both about migration of an distincted big size animal, named edmon...
^^
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...he provided reasons are not convincing. moreover, the lecturer offers 3 theories to chal...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...h for a migration, What about the kids? moreover, she illustrates that the tiny animal w...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, thus, whereas, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 1977.66487455 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 243.0 407.700716846 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85596707819 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49776272057 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576131687243 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 618.680645161 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2605738914 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.45110844103 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.