Topic People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment Which ONE of the following three actions is MOST useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community Why Plant trees and crea

Essay topics:

Topic: People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment. Which ONE of the following three actions is MOST useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community? Why?
--Plant trees and create parks
--Persuade local shops to stop providing plastic bags to customers
--Increase access to public transportation ( for example, buses or trains) to reduce the number of automobiles on local roads.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Speaking of the most useful technique to improve the local environment, I would like to stand for making access to public transportation easier. Even though some might support planting trees and creating parks or preventing local shops from providing plastic bags to customers, I find a couple of shortcomings for these two options.
First of all, to plant trees or to create parks is a more long-term plan which cannot be effective instantly. It takes time for trees to grow, making it a less attractive choice if we would like to see a quick change. Moreover, nowadays, cities are occupied by buildings and roads, leaving limited space for trees or parks. Our school did an investigation on the potential location for growing more greens in the community, and the idea turned out to be unrealistic due to little room remaining for plants around us.

Furthermore, on one side, the number of local shops are such an astonishing figure, which requires us to invest too much efforts and time. On the other side, it is literally difficult to make sure all shops on the list, or at least a majority of them, to agree that they will stop offering plastic bags. The reasons for them to refuse the proposal are obvious, as plastic bags are cheaper and they provide convenience to shoppers.

Lastly, let's talk about the favoured idea here, to reduce the number of automobiles on local roads by increasing access to public transportation. It has an immediate impact on the environment, if implemented, with less gas released due to the declined usage of automobiles. It is not that hard to deploy as it sounds, for the fact that only two reasonable moves are in demand to accomplish the plan. Foremost, we can encourage the local government to reduce the price for taking buses or trains, or to offer discounts for those who take public transportations more frequently. It is just a matter of negotiation, which is easy, as long as a myriad of citizens ask for that. Additionally, we can reorganize the routes of buses to assure that more locals have easier access to use them. Only a few new bus stations need to be settled, which is a short-term effort.

To conclude, it is compelling that we should consider making public transportatione available to te commun

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...figure, which requires us to invest too much efforts and time. On the other side, it...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, so, at least, speaking of, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83762886598 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8464660094 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9945929688 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.411764706 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8235294118 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169961191553 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529640224918 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310617924834 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905251199747 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387346994476 0.0645574589148 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.