Topic: Some university professors let their students choose their research topic themselves. Some do not. Which one do you think is better. Why?@
The combination of interest and effort leads to the luminous results. Universities always have been places for intellectual nourishment, and they have been established to promote science and individuals’ innovative faculty. According to some psychologists, individuals make their best efforts in the fields they have a predisposition to. But the other point here is whether students’ predilection for the research field is profitable for science world or not. An ineluctable query which always has been the topic of contention and brought about heated debates is whether professors should let their students choose their research topic themselves or not. From my vantage point, students should work on their research interest. In what follows, I will elaborate on my perspective.
First of all, it is significant to be mentioned that universities are the last step of students to initiate their occupational life, and it is a very cardinal period of time to procure and establish their self-esteem and autonomy. It is very momentous value for universities to nurture students who are innovative and mentally open. If professors let the students choose their research field according to their interest, it would benefit students and society in manifold ways. For instance, the student will attend his research very diligently and he would experience mental flow which is a satisfaction in doing an interesting activity during which you do are not cognizant of time passage. The result of such hard and ginger work would be very successful and will lead to great scientific results. This student will have a very proper self-esteem because he could flower his potential abilities and he will be a profitable person to his society too.
Another reason which deserves some attention is that professors would benefit in this way too. For instance, if professors accede to their student's research field, they will be familiar with new fields they have not tried. So in this way, they could extend more their sweeping knowledge and maybe find something new in the terra incognita. Furthermore, the success of their students would benefit them in another way too. If their students are successful, their academic rate will rise and they will win their students’ acclaim which is the most precious thing for a teacher. This success and approbation will give the teachers the sense of equanimity which is the best experience in life. From my viewpoint, it is the best achievement for teacher and it would be a repose from arduous work they have done to that point.
Reflecting upon all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that it is the best way to let students choose their research field. Students who can accommodate their interest and their efforts will get the best results in their life. They will develop a very integrated personality, especially in occupational settings and this progress will disseminate to other aspects of their life. Their acquired self-esteem and self-government will scatter to their social relations too. So with some meditation, it is obvious that success in the university and life is very dependent on the harmony which students can experience in the university. It can be a very great field of research for scientists to promote students’ future welfare. They can assay students’ sense of freedom in choosing research field and the effects on future development and success in every aspect of students’ life.
- In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park with abundant numbers of each species However in 2002 only four species of amphibians were observed in the park and the numbers of each species were drasti 93
- Tpo19.1 80
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 53
- tpo 27.1 80
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ational life, and it is a very cardinal period of time to procure and establish their self-est...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 827, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uous work they have done to that point. Reflecting upon all the aforementioned r...
^^^
Line 4, column 800, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to research'
Suggestion: to research
...ents' sense of freedom in choosing research field and the effects on future develop...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 9.8082437276 275% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2925.0 1977.66487455 148% => OK
No of words: 555.0 407.700716846 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27027027027 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85370353223 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00679964203 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.437837837838 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 890.1 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2709595255 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.37037037037 5.45110844103 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328409350046 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100101613617 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839102666406 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219297221769 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312045712646 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.