TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In public and private commutes cars are vastly use. Cars have been used as private communication or as a taxi or shear cab. Many companies like uber or ola make a business out of these private or cab systems. When it comes to how our future will be looked like, I think there will be not much difference in our future days comparing with our present day.
First of all, Private cars have been used by who can afford and we use cabs to avoid public traffic and more comfortable journey. Cars are getting cheaper and peoples buy it as a sometimes as a social status. In the near future, the population increased and more people can afford cars and peoples find the ways to make their journeys more comfortable. So there is a huge chance that the amount of cars increases dramatically.
Our economist and environmentalists prevent us from buying cars because of the emission of carbon dioxide from cars and traffic getting worse. But, maybe the concept of the car totally changes in our future. Even now Tesla and many other car companies introduced electric cars to the markets and maybe in future cars fly just like science fiction movies.
Some peoples argue that in the near future peoples sincere about traffic problems and use more public transport. Our public transport may be developed or invent some new comfortable and convincing way for peoples. But there is a chance that due to overpopulation public transport getting worse and overwhelmed by crowed and more peoples prefer private transport. Use of cars or public transport depends on peoples and countries. For example, in the United Stated peoples prefer cars over public transport whereas in Europe peoples prefer public transport. So the use of cars increase or decrease depends on countries policy and its peoples and it is always unpredictable what are the new invention near future will bring to us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | Luis Cortes | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | amitupretii | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | M.S 2019 | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | shaima900 | 70 | view |
- Essay topics:The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity 77
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing TaskA recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 70
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most co 50
- The following appeared in an article in the Grandview Beacon."For many years the city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony. Last year, however, private contributions to the symphony increased by 200 percent and attendan 77
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing TaskIn the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wil 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'used'.
Suggestion: used
...ic and private commutes cars are vastly use. Cars have been used as private communi...
^^^
Line 6, column 608, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...of cars increase or decrease depends on countries policy and its peoples and it is always...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 685, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...it is always unpredictable what are the new invention near future will bring to us.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, whereas, for example, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.865625 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60501132135 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5445171004 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5882352941 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11984627642 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488375734439 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304153605906 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822875262257 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191546497169 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.