TPO-06 - Integrated Writing Task Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specifi

The author and lecturer are both talking about online encyclopedia's advantages and disadvantages. However, the professor claims that the communal online encyclopedia is worth to pay for even it is small and refutes that the main point made in the reading passage. The following three points of view between two parties are presented as followed.

First of all, the lecturer argues that the one online that anyone could reach and fix which questions the author's point of view that the original encyclopedias are written by professional researchers or experts so nonspecialists can not add idea or archive. According to the speaker, she states that sometime the mistakes in the original one could not be found and never going to be modified.

Second, the speaker mentioned that the traditional one is protected from hackers or vandals on the other hand the one online might be modified by any users. Moreover, the women says that if the format is changed by someone, the format can not fix easily.

Lastly, the professor tells that the traditional encyclopedias have limited space to describe which is problem the author considered in the reading passage. However, the one online can have space as much as they need. The big advantage of the online encyclopedias is diversity. Contrary to the paper one, we can find the wide range of topics and views therefore we probably can have more variety of ideas and perspective made by many people all over the world.

In conclusion, the main points made by the professor in the lecture cast doubt on the main points made in the reading passage.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, talking about, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 267.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98501872659 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7194003199 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7369974413 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.916666667 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 5.45110844103 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17668228768 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715015373785 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480981437622 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908152255826 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475292963773 0.0645574589148 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.