TPO 19- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Information is very important part of our lives. It is vital in every human being because they will be updated in latest news and updates with what's happening around the world. Some people believe that in order to be well informed, a person must get information from different news sources. In my humble opinion, I agree that it is better to have different news resources. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, gaining information to news are very easy nowadays compared to the past that news media platforms are not yet available. We are fortunate that technology are continuing evolving to service the people better with means of getting and processing information on the internet. People are equipped with choices which data or sources to read and study. Individuals has the capability to absorb all the information available with different resources like news media, internet websites such as CNN, BBC, Bloomberg, which are informative sites which can help us be aware of current news in the world. For instance, when I need information about other countries I just browse my mobile phone and open CNN website and BBC news. I get updated easily and there are mobile notification with the trending news online. I read an article in CNN that the president in Brazil is open for open logging in the Amazon forest, and it is very devastating to know that a person has the capability to make such a destruction to the ecosystem. This news made me realize how important the wildlife is for every human being and we must take care of our environment. To sum up, having the chance to get information from different sources are informative and you can acquire deep knowledge in that topic matter.
Secondly, the only negative consequences I see with too many resources available are information overload, not reliable data and fake news. But people are aware of such fake news circulating around the web and they can easily spot if this website are not to be trusted. All in all, we cannot say that the negative consequences out weights the positive outcome. For example, there is fake news circulating the internet about our Mayor in Paranaque City being assassinated in the City hall when this news spread our Mayor immediately released a news regarding his current status that he was fine and not harmed. People panic at a short period of time but quickly realized that the news may not be true because there are no update regarding the assassination. As a result, citizens are now more vigilant with what they read and hear on the news.
To summarize, I believe that gaining information from different sources will make the individual be well informed. This is because they will become more aware and knowledgeable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the latest'.
Suggestion: in the latest
...uman being because they will be updated in latest news and updates with whats happening a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...updated in latest news and updates with whats happening around the world. Some people...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 635, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...and not harmed. People panic at a short period of time but quickly realized that the news may ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 722, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'updates'?
Suggestion: updates
...ws may not be true because there are no update regarding the assassination. As a resul...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, i feel, such as, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2309.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86105263158 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68688494218 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482105263158 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.9 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1736610666 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.954545455 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5909090909 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275334536731 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871505365493 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789629502284 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18507086503 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707107361287 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.