In our competitive world, every individual tries to enhance his skills and augment his knowledge to achieve his goals and ambitions. Every year, thousands of books and seminars are being presented to community members regarding success and ways to catch it. With this in mind, a question, a matter of debate is what the most effective way to be successful is? Whether persevering on what we do well or challenging our mind with new skills? Although some of the ordinary walks of life are of the opinion that a combination of the effort and mastery over what we do leads to luminous results, on the extreme of the rope, others would oppose. I am, to a great extent, on the belief that trying new things and taking risks have always played a crucial role in burgeoning people's talents to pave their way to success. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoint with focusing on two outstanding reasons.
To commence, one of the compelling reasons that justify the thesis is that challenging our mind would be possible just by trying new tasks. To put in general words, facing new problems, our brain uses all its capacity to surmount obstacles, so improving creativeness and intelligence would be achieved. Needless to say, to be creative plays an important role that a person success is heavily based on this critical juncture. To bring a vivid example, I'm pretty sure you have heard of Babak Bakhtiyari, the Iranian inventor of Icepack. Preparing a new kind of ice cream to ply his guests inspired him to establish his business. They encouraged Babak to make his company, for they enjoyed his innovation in creating new tastes and foods. He obtained fund and wealth as the result of challenging his mind. As can be seen, although a certain conclusion cannot be made, in spite of all deniable merits of consistency in our routine, prosperous people always try new experiences.
Alongside with the first reason elaborated above, every individual who tries new tasks and avoids the repetitions of daily life can improve every aspect of their mind and flourish their unique talents. In effect, daily tasks always lead to exhausted and dull, whereas, taking risks bring about excitement and content. It goes without saying that new experiences provide us with an unmatched opportunity to thrive our latent talents. For instance¸ in my first job experience, when I had just graduated from university, I worked in an architecture company as an accountant. After a while, one of my colleagues suggested me to work with her as an assistant in managing the website of the company. By that time, I had never worked on a site, but to cooperate my colleague taught me lots of things regarding advertisement, contact with costumers, and programming. I found I'm interested in programming and I attended classes to learn more. A couple of months later, I was hired as a programmer in a famous company which was an opportunity to make profits and new experiences for me. Therefore, the more the skills you acquire, the more the talents you will be flourishing, so the prosperity would be achieved.
All by all, by taking all the aforementioned into consideration, it can easily be upheld that trying new things is an element that is set to assume a great influence on human's prosperity. Not only do new tasks challenge our mind to overcome the difficulties and problems, but also inspire us to burgeon our talents. I highly recommend that to achieve what you want, give up routines and immerse in the world with unknown things.
- Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are more important. Which one do you prefer and why? 76
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 450, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ging our mind with new skills? Although some of the ordinary walks of life are of the opini...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...cal juncture. To bring a vivid example, Im pretty sure you have heard of Babak Bak...
^^
Line 3, column 975, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rous people always try new experiences. Alongside with the first reason elaborat...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 869, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...th costumers, and programming. I found Im interested in programming and I attende...
^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...t is set to assume a great influence on humans prosperity. Not only do new tasks chall...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...merse in the world with unknown things.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, in general, kind of, in spite of, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 92.0 52.1666666667 176% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2933.0 1977.66487455 148% => OK
No of words: 600.0 407.700716846 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88833333333 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94923200384 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84313940331 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 322.0 212.727598566 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536666666667 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 912.6 618.680645161 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.94265232975 324% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5538194021 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.62962963 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196374539525 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513546014963 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434026833179 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128921385949 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444097101388 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 86.8835125448 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.