It is undeniable that education quality of universities depends heavily on the quality of professors. Therefore, in my opinion, I strongly agree with the statement that universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors to improve the quality of education for two reasons.
To begin with, a high salary is always a strong incentive in the job market. Therefore, spending more money on salaries for professors will not only drive university professors to perform well in order to secure their career, but also can attract more potential and competitive candidates who consider themselves competent for the role. Therefore, universities can not only ignite the teaching passion of their professors, but also have sufficient supply of professors outside their schools who are willing to take the job because of the high salaries, which will help maintain the teaching quality of professors due to the intense competitiveness. Take the public universities in Taiwan for an example. Since there is a limitation of professor salaries by Taiwan regulation, many famous and reputed professors who were once teaching in Taiwan public universities are now teaching in universities in Hong Kong because they offer two times higher than universities in Taiwan do, which demonstrates that higher salaries are key to attracting great professors. Further, those Hong Kong universities which are willing to provide higher salaries and attract professors from all over the world all rank higher than Taiwanese universities in the ranking of education quality, which explains that increasing salaries for professors is a positive factor of improving education quality.
Secondly, a high salary can equip professors with a better living standard, so they don't need to spend more time on earning money besides their education career. In this way, they can stay focused on teaching, which will definitely bring up the quality of education. There was a news years ago stating that a Taiwanese university professor found his salary far from enough to support his family; consequently, he taught in a private cram school after his regular working hours to make more money. In order to bring more sales to that cram school, he would leak the upcoming examination questions to students in the cram school, which was totally against the regulation and seriously did harm to the rights of students who didn't do the cram school. The behavior of the professor is totally incorrect, but it points out an issue when salaries for professors are way too low. In this case, some of them will still run the risk to break the rule and eventually harm the quality of education.
Based on the two reasons above, I totally agree with statement that universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors to give them more incentives to perform well and be more focused on education, and improve the quality of education.
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 79
- TPO-29:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- 1.Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, 49
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sur 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... with a better living standard, so they dont need to spend more time on earning mone...
^^^^
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ng examination questions to students in the cram school, which was totally against the r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 723, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... did harm to the rights of students who didnt do the cram school. The behavior of the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 732, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... to the rights of students who didnt do the cram school. The behavior of the professor i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, as to, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2463.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22929936306 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85176338378 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467091295117 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 788.4 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.0298876706 48.9658058833 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.2 100.406767564 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4 20.6045352989 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334984982821 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137587652989 0.076458572812 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118295225066 0.0737576698707 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29523910177 0.150856017488 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125055131812 0.0645574589148 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.1575268817 163% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.