Some teachers give assignments to the students in which students must work together in a group. Some people believe that by this way the students can use the knowledge and skills of each other and will learn effectively. In my perspective this is a good way for students to learn more because they can learn from each other, also learn social behaviors and finally the result of the project will be more worth than working alone.
Each student has special knowledge and skills, hence when they work together, they will learn from each other. Numerous minds is better than one mind and thought, therefore when they confront an obstacle, they will propose numerous solutions for it. Hence, the problems will be solved easily and the project will proceed more quickly. For instance, when I was a high school student, I and my friends were working on a project a little time for that, we decided to divide the work and each one do a part of it. Also, when a problem had appeared in the work, each of us propose a solution, then decide which one is better; by this way we could finish the project on time and the result was amazing.
In my opinion the most important benefit of the group working for students is learning social behaviors. In addition to learning the skills that are related to the projects, more important lessons that students will learn are social behaviors. For instance they will lean respect to each other, listen to others opinion, be responsible and other social behaviors. This is a good practice for the future and be successful in their jobs because most of the jobs deal with group working. Hence, they learn more than what seems.
Finally, the result of the group working is worth than projects that in which students work alone. When the students work in a group, each of them do the part of the project, however the result of the whole project is more valuable than working alone. When a student works alone, never can attain such results of the group working hence, the big projects usually done by a group, not individuals. By this way students learn how to manage and do the big projects.
To summarize, group working is more valuable than working alone for the students because they can learn more a lot of skills and the result of the project will be better.
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 60
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 80
- TPO-50 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO 27 integrated writing : Little Ice Age 73
- TOEFL TPO 27 - Integrated Writing Task 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: WORTH_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse', the comparative of 'bad'?
Suggestion: worse
...lly, the result of the group working is worth than projects that in which students wo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e result of the project will be better.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, hence, however, so, then, therefore, for instance, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65517241379 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30472917144 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4039408867 0.524837075471 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8197189002 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363446264986 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155216919436 0.076458572812 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843451675418 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245046251072 0.150856017488 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575222216051 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.