tpo 33
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
One of the most important duties of the teachers is preparing suitable situations for students to learn the lessons well and deeply. I completely agree that doing projects with other students is an appropriate method for students to learn more.
First, students can enlarge their knowledge. Nowadays, by emerging the new invention such as the internet, students can learn vital information and skills. So, each student has knowledge about different field of sience and technology. And, when students want to do projects with each other, they can share their information with others. Hence, all of the students can obtain useful information about their subject. But, if they want to learn all of that information or skills, they should spend a lot of time, and maybe they do not learn as much as they learn from their friends.
Second, avoiding from mental disaster is another noticeable reason. Todays, most of the students spend most of their time for studying and passing several classes. So, they suffer a lot of strees and pressures. In this situation, being with other students is a great opportunity for all of them because they can speak with other students about their difficulties. Therefore, they can remove the stress and pressure from themselves and will have a helthy mind. Having the helthy mind helps them to learn more. However, if they do the roject alone, they endure extra stress which brings them other mental disaster such as headache or heart diseases.
On the other hand, some people think that students can learn more when they do project lonely. Mostly, they become responsible. Doing the assignment is a great occasion for the students to learn how to do their duty on time and well. However, I still assret that doing project with others is better. When they are being one member of the group, they know the meaning of teamworks, and responsibility. According to the reasearch which has done on MIT University, the 60 percent of the students which have cooperation with others are more responsible and sociable person in comaparison with the students who do the project by themselves.
In conclusion, the advantages of having cooperation with other students prove that it is perfect method of teaching students. Extendig knowledge and gaining a helthy mind are the two benefit of doing project
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | nusybah | 70 | view |
- tpo 47 70
- Do you agree that people easily learn from the friends beside them? Use specific examples and evidences to support your answer. 61
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. 73
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 70
- tpo 27 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...ir knowledge. Nowadays, by emerging the new invention such as the internet, students can lear...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e their information with others. Hence, all of the students can obtain useful information ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ind are the two benefit of doing project
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04935064935 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59713764882 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477922077922 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3545178242 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5217391304 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7391304348 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95652173913 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270324615649 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920756302149 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561891602753 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173632990366 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640499105522 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.