TPO 38
There has been class="much">much discussion around the topic of people class="leadership">leadership abilities. one class="group">group of people believe class="that">that class="leadership">leadership comes naturally. On the class="other">other hand, others assert the class="leadership">leadership people class="can">can class="learn">learn to be a class="leader">leader. According to class="my">my experience and actual observation class="about">about class="life">life class="have">have class="led">led me to agree with class="those">those of people class="that">that class="thing">thing class="leadership">leadership class="can">can be learned. I class="have">have class="much">much class="reason">reason to prove class="my">my class="point">point.
The first and foremost consequential class="reason">reason class="is">is class="that">that people in class="life">life class="learn">learn a class="lot">lot of class="thing">thing class="about">about different fields and the class="leadership">leadership class="can">can class="learn">learn too. class="must">must of the people class="that">that class="come">come a class="long">long class="line">line of leaders class="don’t">don’t class="have">have a guarantee to be a class="good">good class="leader">leader in their class="life">life. one compelling example class="about">about class="leadership">leadership in class="govern">govern country, I had the history class in the last semester and in the class, we talked class="about">about the one king class="that">that comes from a class="long">long class="line">line of king and ruler class="life">life, but he class="can">can’t control the country and always guide their people in wrong way. he wasn’t successful in political, commercial, international trade, international communications and class="other">other fields, which class="is">is important for governing the country and supply people’s need.
Another class="point">point class="that">that springing to mind class="is">is class="that">that class="good">good class="leader">leader class="must">must specialize in different field class="that">that class="can">can help them to manage their country or groups in the right way and they class="have">have sufficient skill class="that">that people class="can">can trust him people class="don’t">don’t see just their natural ability class="about">about class="leadership">leadership field, but they see their knowledge, wisdom, and experiences in the class="leadership">leadership field. leaders class="that">that class="come">come from people and working a class="lot">lot to specialize in a different field class="that">that class="can">can be a class="good">good class="leader">leader be successful rather than class="those">those people class="that">that just because their ancestor be a class="leader">leader. The class="good">good class="leader">leader class="must">must class="have">have class="good">good relationships with class="other">other people and always class="can">can persuade them to choose he to guide them
To sum it all up by taking all the detail into consideration, I think the class="good">good class="leader">leader class="must">must class="come">come from ordinary people and class="have">have enough wisdom class="about">about the different field class="that">that class="can">can guide the country in a successful way. class="leadership">leadership class="can">can be learned and all the people class="can">can specialize in the necessary field and gain enough wisdom in a different field class="that">that class="led">led them and their people to successful ways.
- TPO 22 73
- Apparently, there has been a historical debate about the reality of reaching the North pole by Robert e beary . 60
- TPO-37-2Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career job would lead to a secure, successful future. (TPO39-Task2) 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...adership'>leadership abilities. one class='group'>group of peo...
^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
...n class='learn'>learn too. class='must'>must of the people ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 825, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...n their class='life'>life. one compelling example class='about&ap...
^^^
Line 3, column 1353, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...always guide their people in wrong way. he wasn't successful in political, co...
^^
Line 5, column 807, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Leaders
...s;leadership'>leadership field. leaders class='that'>that class=&a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1552, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...'>can persuade them to choose he to guide them To sum it all up by ta...
^^
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a successful way" with adverb for "successful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...apos;can'>can guide the country in a successful way. class='leadership'>leader...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
... guide the country in a successful way. class='leadership'>leadership cl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4615.0 1977.66487455 233% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 12.1767810026 4.8611393121 250% => Less chars per word wanted.
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 12.3596518731 2.67179642975 463% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427440633245 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1147.5 618.680645161 185% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 3.0 1.51630824373 198% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 23.0 9.59856630824 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 204.519873602 48.9658058833 418% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 355.0 100.406767564 354% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 29.1538461538 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.07692307692 5.45110844103 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 50.5 11.7677419355 429% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -76.4 58.1214874552 -131% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 20.3 6.10430107527 333% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 31.1 10.1575268817 306% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 53.96 10.9000537634 495% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.