TPO 38
There has been class="much">much discussion around the topic of people class="leadership">leadership abilities. one class="group">group of people believe class="that">that class="leadership">leadership comes naturally. On the class="other">other hand, others assert the class="leadership">leadership people class="can">can class="learn">learn to be a class="leader">leader. According to class="my">my experience and actual observation class="about">about class="life">life class="have">have class="led">led me to agree with class="those">those of people class="that">that class="thing">thing class="leadership">leadership class="can">can be learned. I class="have">have class="much">much class="reason">reason to prove class="my">my class="point">point.
The first and foremost consequential class="reason">reason class="is">is class="that">that people in class="life">life class="learn">learn a class="lot">lot of class="thing">thing class="about">about different fields and the class="leadership">leadership class="can">can class="learn">learn too. class="must">must of the people class="that">that class="come">come a class="long">long class="line">line of leaders class="don’t">don’t class="have">have a guarantee to be a class="good">good class="leader">leader in their class="life">life. one compelling example class="about">about class="leadership">leadership in class="govern">govern country, I had the history class in the last semester and in the class, we talked class="about">about the one king class="that">that comes from a class="long">long class="line">line of king and ruler class="life">life, but he class="can">can’t control the country and always guide their people in wrong way. he wasn’t successful in political, commercial, international trade, international communications and class="other">other fields, which class="is">is important for governing the country and supply people’s need.
Another class="point">point class="that">that springing to mind class="is">is class="that">that class="good">good class="leader">leader class="must">must specialize in different field class="that">that class="can">can help them to manage their country or groups in the right way and they class="have">have sufficient skill class="that">that people class="can">can trust him people class="don’t">don’t see just their natural ability class="about">about class="leadership">leadership field, but they see their knowledge, wisdom, and experiences in the class="leadership">leadership field. leaders class="that">that class="come">come from people and working a class="lot">lot to specialize in a different field class="that">that class="can">can be a class="good">good class="leader">leader be successful rather than class="those">those people class="that">that just because their ancestor be a class="leader">leader. The class="good">good class="leader">leader class="must">must class="have">have class="good">good relationships with class="other">other people and always class="can">can persuade them to choose he to guide them
To sum it all up by taking all the detail into consideration, I think the class="good">good class="leader">leader class="must">must class="come">come from ordinary people and class="have">have enough wisdom class="about">about the different field class="that">that class="can">can guide the country in a successful way. class="leadership">leadership class="can">can be learned and all the people class="can">can specialize in the necessary field and gain enough wisdom in a different field class="that">that class="led">led them and their people to successful ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...adership'>leadership abilities. one class='group'>group of peo...
^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
...n class='learn'>learn too. class='must'>must of the people ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 825, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...n their class='life'>life. one compelling example class='about&ap...
^^^
Line 3, column 1353, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...always guide their people in wrong way. he wasn't successful in political, co...
^^
Line 5, column 807, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Leaders
...s;leadership'>leadership field. leaders class='that'>that class=&a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1552, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...'>can persuade them to choose he to guide them To sum it all up by ta...
^^
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a successful way" with adverb for "successful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...apos;can'>can guide the country in a successful way. class='leadership'>leader...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
... guide the country in a successful way. class='leadership'>leadership cl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4615.0 1977.66487455 233% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 12.1767810026 4.8611393121 250% => Less chars per word wanted.
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 12.3596518731 2.67179642975 463% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427440633245 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1147.5 618.680645161 185% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 3.0 1.51630824373 198% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 23.0 9.59856630824 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 204.519873602 48.9658058833 418% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 355.0 100.406767564 354% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 29.1538461538 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.07692307692 5.45110844103 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 50.5 11.7677419355 429% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -76.4 58.1214874552 -131% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 20.3 6.10430107527 333% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 31.1 10.1575268817 306% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 53.96 10.9000537634 495% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.