Job selection has been a burning global issue. Some specialists suggest that the past is a better time for finding a job that has a high success ratio than the present. Personally, I disagree with this suggestion.
On one hand, what I put in my priority is the accuracy in selecting a career. The fact is that the modern world owns the peak of technology development. As a result, the finders are certain to have conditions to spend their time searching for the information online. Correspondingly, because the online store has a huge amount of information, people have a tendency to gain enough information that is necessary. Therefore, their decision about what job they should take is more accurate. More importantly, the education system of the present is bound to be more flourishing than that of the past. It follows that people incline to have a more stable background of knowledge. Thus, they are able to readily perceive the information that they receive. Hence, they are supposed to choose a job that is more suitable for them. Beyond any doubt, the modern world offers lots of convenient conditions for people to search for the future path.
On the other hand, it is claimed that the present has too many kinds of jobs to choose from. Consequently, the mistake in selecting the job is certain to exist. However, it is just applicable to a minority. In fact, the finders always have an effective way in this work. For this reason, they are highly likely to do it without difficulty. In addition, the economics of the country develop over time. Successively, it stands a golden chance for people to have a better live condition. Subsequently, there is a likelihood that it stops them from falling into the stressful moments. In this case, their mind is apt to feel more comfortable, and their brain tends to be wiser. Accordingly, it is the essence of an accurate decision. By and large, the claim that people are more likely to make the flaw in job selection is unrealistic.
In summary, for all the mentioned above, the present selection is a compelling topic. It is strongly advised that the specialists should take my writing into great consideration to guideline an appropriate policy on job selection.
- TPO 48 - Integrated Writing Task 75
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TOEFL T P O 42 - Integrated Writing Task 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, as to, in addition, in fact, in summary, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87862796834 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8703292077 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519788918206 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9310977063 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.1153846154 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5769230769 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88461538462 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0773908445499 0.236089414692 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0226102238049 0.076458572812 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272805686857 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562798035257 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388379488059 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.