It is crystal clear, teachers has an decisive role in any society. Not only do people, who were good students in their schools, respect their teacher but also those students who were not interested in education when they were in their school honor their teacher. Some peoplel beleive that teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the mast than they were nowadays; the other people disagree with the idea. Unfortunately, I have to defend the former group for two important reasons which are elaborated in the following paragraphs.
First, nowadays there are some othere ways of learning in which there is not a teacher face-to-face. In the new learning approches, people do not have to have a teacher and learn from them. they prefer to learn in a way which is more convinence. They will not need to learn from teachers in person. For example, one way of learning which is cheaper and more comfortable is self-study. In this way you do not have any teacher who teach you, you just study by yourself. So, teacher does not have any role in this kind of learning. As you can see, naturally, removing the role teacher in some way of learning result in lack of appreciated them in learning.
Second, todays, life conditions has changed. In the past, most of people were completely ilitirate. Even a majority of people were not able to read. Moreover, the number of people who were able to read and write was low in every area. In those abysmal conditions, the role of teacher was more sensible than todays. Now people can read and even write without going to any school because they can learn most of them before going to school from their parents, their siblings, or even from the media. For example, my little brother who is less that five-years old can read some book story. As you can see, lacking more need for teacher's role is decreased considerabley.
To sum up, I completely agree with the idea that teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the mast than they were nowadays. Not only are there some othere ways of learning without teachers but condition of life has changed. People should learn new things from their teachers as much as they can and respect them as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
It is crystal clear, teachers has an decisive role in any society. Not only ...
^^
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... to have a teacher and learn from them. they prefer to learn in a way which is more ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...fe conditions has changed. In the past, most of people were completely ilitirate. Even a major...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mple, my little brother who is less that five-years old can read some book story....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, well, for example, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70284237726 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45326758773 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434108527132 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.464925651 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1304347826 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8260869565 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52173913043 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248871269403 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817266631281 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877886633604 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180478056127 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677688080088 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.