TPO-41
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education is one of the main things for our life, and teachers are those people who teach us something. Even though there are many kinds of teachers depend on where or which subject they teach, all teachers are respectfull member of the society. It seems to me that teachers are always valued same way. I feel this way for two most important reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, the way of thinking of people are changed and that impacts on the reverence of the teacher. Once people thought teacher's main responsibility was to make a good student, but now this trend has changed; people consider them more than the medium of education. For instance, when I was at school, I saw most of the student were afraid teachers because they punished the student. On the other hand, I recently visited my school again for some personal purposes and met with my honorable teachers. I found very few of my teacher as most of them have already taken their retard. I amused by the behavior of one schoolboy who came to one of junior teacher and talked without any fear. But I observed that the boldness of the boy was not mean he dishonors the teacher. So, people way of revering other is continuously changing but respect is not banished.
Secondly, now people are more dependent on the computer to learn new things which reduce the connection between teacher and people. If you read any story about the life of any teacher before the 1980s, you would find that people normally depended on the decision of teachers of that locality for any serious matter because there were very few educated people. But now the percentage of literacy is more than that time. As a result, now people are self-defended and freer to take their decision; moreover, they can get any information from the Internet which was not present that time. But again in most of the time, people ask to join teachers to them with due respect. Even though the way of involvement of teachers in our day to day life is changed, we general people respect our teacher in the same way.
In sum up, the way of revering of our teacher is changing but not reduced. It is because people nowadays are more candid and because the percentage of literacy is improved and people have other options to get information. So, we need to keep connected with our teacher to know more and we should always respect them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Sarrraaa | 68 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | 3dra | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | wang kuan huan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | wang kuan huan | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | bishal sitaula | 68 | view |
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
- TPO 26: It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. 70
- Tpo33 71
- TPO 29-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 70
- tpo4. In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Disgree or disagree. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: I_AFRAID[8]
Message: The adjective afraid is used with 'of': 'afraid of teachers'.
Suggestion: afraid of teachers
... school, I saw most of the student were afraid teachers because they punished the student. On t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, i feel, as a result, first of all, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62823529412 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42147257093 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487058823529 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0087292062 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2380952381 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150892126864 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516507949939 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255237611938 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10332374419 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191316958314 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.