There are different views on doing the work in a day. Some people think that similar work gives them more satisfaction, while others think that working on different tasks gives them more happiness and advantageous. In my view, I agree that workers are more satisfied when they do different tasks because they can learn a lot of new things in the process of performing a task and they can feel more active because of different challenges in a day.
First of all, workers can increase their knowledge when they do various tasks in a day. For instance, my friend worked at a company where she used to do the same task all the day. She initially felt very happy as there is no need to work hard. But later on, when she wanted to do another job she was rejected by many companies because she did not know anything about the other subjects. Moreover, her knowledge was limited by doing a similar job all the day. Therefore, learning new things or doing new activities is very important for our future growth and to expand our skills.
Second, workers can feel more active when doing a different work in a day. For instance, after the completion of engineering, I got a job. In that company, I used to get similar task all the day. So that, I used to feel so drowsy and sleepy. Which made me so dull for the whole day. As a result, I used to feel inactive and bored there is no satisfaction for me in doing that job. Moreover, doing different tasks helps us to increase our creativity. If you do things differently or experiment with different tasks daily, then we can increase our ability to think differently. Which also helps to get better outcomes in a less time which gives more happiness.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that workers who do various tasks in a day would be more satisfied because they can enhance their career and can be active throughout the day.
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 70
- TPO-16 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 81
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 83
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 577, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rease our ability to think differently. Which also helps to get better outcomes in a ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55917159763 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53172337796 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46449704142 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0933307553 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1052631579 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37022917969 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129620113593 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106363755942 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251512495349 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482078449166 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.