Nowadays, people are participating in different classes or meetings. In this regard, sometimes teachers or meeting leaders say something incorrect based on people's opinions. According to these happenings, some people prefer to interrupt and correct the mistake, while others choose to wait and then talk to the teachers or say nothing. When it comes to me, I concur with the second approach. In what follows, I will elaborate on my viewpoint with two specific reasons.
First of all, teachers or meeting leaders have more time to explain the subject meticulously, without any worrying about class or meeting time limitations. To be more specific, every class or meeting has its own time limitation, and the teacher should finish the class at a specific time. In this vein, if the teacher knows that the questions or other points get the class's time, he or she does not allow people to interrupt the class. On the other hand, if individuals wait and ask their questions or talk to the teacher after finishing class, the lecturer has enough time to patiently talk and answer the questions or correct the mistakes.
Secondly, people who wait until the class or meeting is over, and then ask their questions easily remain in the teacher's mind, which allows them to be connected with the teacher and be successful. To elucidate, when people prefer to talk to the teacher after classes, they have conversions with teachers face-to-face, and they spend more time with each other after the class, talking about questions or mistakes, which cause that people remain in lecturer's mind with more details. This happening, remaining in teachers' minds, is preferable and beneficial for all members of classes or meetings because they can use this point and make a stronger relationship with the teacher. My personal experience may shed more light on this matter. Two years ago, I participated in a robotics conference at Sharif university. In one of the workshops, the lecturer said something incorrect, and I decided to wait until finishing the workshop then talk to the teacher. By doing so, I could talk a vast amount of time with the lecturer, and now we are co-workers and working on a valuable paper. Had I interrupted the teacher, I would not have started this academic relationship.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, I firmly believe that people should wait until the class is over then talk to the teacher about the incorrect thing that was said by the lecturer. Not only, does the teacher have more time to explain the problem, but also, people stay in the teacher's mind better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ewpoint with two specific reasons. First of all, teachers or meeting leader...
^^
Line 5, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...questions or correct the mistakes. Secondly, people who wait until the clas...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, in conclusion, talking about, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2255.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13667425968 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77869783879 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510250569476 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.3208914746 48.9658058833 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.277777778 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155151336608 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059832141042 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058510198612 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112166079497 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264523412451 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.