TPO 52 integrated task
The reading and the lecture are both about sending humankind to live on an astroid. The author of the reading feel that this is the best way for continunig humans life. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that option is not practical and have many down sides.
To begin with, the author argues that law gravity on astroids such as Moon or Mars make some good points for spaceships. The article mentions that low gravity lets spacecrafts to consider immense tools to set up a colony. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer who belives that low gravity makes some risks for human body. He claims that living for a long time in a low gravity place causes to loosing muscle and bone density. Additionally, he says that low gravity may make bodies to suffer from many unknown problems.
Secondly, the writer suggest that vast number of important metals on astroids could make money for the colonies. In the article, it is said that there are some rare elements on astroids, for instance gold and platinum which are the best support for the people whose choice is living on another planet. The lecurer, However, rebuts this by mentioning that the reading makes an idealistic picture of the fact. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that costs of mining on another planet makes the deal impossible because of increasing in payments for supplying machines, sending the minerals to the earth, etc.
Finally, the autohr posits that getting to an asteroid would be reachable. more over, in the article it is stated that colonization on an astroid which get closer to earth is easier than living on a planet like Mars. In contranst, the lecturer's position is that travel to an astroid and then travelling from an asteroid to the Earth is a big challenge. He notes that return from an asteroid is not easy because they are far away from the Earth.
- TPO 52 integrated 3
- tpo36-integ writing 3
- Some companies decide not to permit employees to reply the e mail or text associated with the work in the holiday or on the weekend Some people think that this policy will improve the satisfaction of the employees While others argue that banning the reply 85
- Tpo23In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 76
- TPO 46 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he best way for continunig humans life. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: More
...ting to an asteroid would be reachable. more over, in the article it is stated that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.48453608247 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 3.03092783505 627% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 32.9175257732 82% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 26.3917525773 174% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 937.175257732 168% => OK
No of words: 333.0 206.0 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72372372372 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 3.78020617076 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42259531643 2.54303337028 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 127.690721649 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543543543544 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 290.88556701 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 9.0 0.824742268041 1091% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7344789766 44.8134815571 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5294117647 76.5299724578 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 16.8248392259 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 4.34317383033 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.216113520407 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0766984524023 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.12726935374 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0580467560999 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 8.37731958763 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 8.71597938144 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 7.59969072165 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 41.2886597938 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 8.62886597938 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.