TPO 64 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own Use | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

TPO 64: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Knowing about other people's perspectives and communicating with them are the most important pillars for each society in today's world. Due to the fact, we live in a chaotic and fast-peace world, it is important for us to access the last news. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether people to read or watch the news from people who have a different opinion from them, or whether, they should receive news from those whose views are similar. Some people possess the conviction that the former is more agreeable whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that the latter is more fruitful. I am personally content that this issue is multifaceted. Although the news is an important source for people, there are many strategies that make people change true. I prefer to continue with the second approach. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is that there are some benefits in getting news from persons who have similar perspectives to us. There is less chance to change the truth of what exactly happened. Some influential people, who have some benefits in misleading people try to change the truth and make up false facts. In this way, we have to access different news sources to know and judge. Consider my personal experience to make this point more clear. In a football match, some reporters try to make false facts about some players. Instead of telling truth, they make margins about players' abilities and people always judge the player's abilities based on them. Last season, my favorite football team could not get Ligue and I read false reports about its players. There were a lot of negative comments on Twitter about them. But I could find a source who wrote the truth.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that reading news from people who have different views makes an unpleasant situation, people try to argue with each other and sometimes it brings fighting and struggling.
In brief, due to the aforementioned reasons, I prefer to hear news from people who have a similar perspective to me.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2023-04-17	Mitra-T	76	view
2023-04-17	Hossein2000	90	view
2023-04-10	KimiaKermanshahian	80	view
2023-03-20	redark777	90	view
2023-01-16	janfaisal	73	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by user porteghale Abiasli :

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...ng reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is that there are some be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, in brief

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57192223833 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9793355942 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.25 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213915746563 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587960812956 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696267882298 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149484890706 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745326494872 0.0645574589148 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.