Whereas some people believe the internet offer people an opportunity for useful information, others consider the widespread of the internet could lead to numerous issues. From my perspective, I firmly believe the latter group carries more weight and I will elaborate on my viewpoint in the following paragraphs.
First of all, the internet could provide wrong information to the users. Obviously, if the users search the current news on the internet, the source of the news might from people who have a purpose and trying to mislead the public opinion. In contrast, the information from a reliable group such as the television or newspaper has the responsibility to check the content or needs to provide a mutual opinion. Consequently, the internet as a medium is not an ideal method to obtain information. For instance, in early 2021, Oxford University published an investigation of the cyber-disinformation during the presidential election of the united states of America in 2020. The survey indicated that over twenty percent of the news and announcement on the internet are incorrect and was manufactured by people who try to manipulate the public opinion on a certain event. Hence, the example illustrates that the internet can cause problems when it comes to delivering news.
Second, the internet can lead to danger and fraud without notice. Evidently, the internet connects users around the world and makes communication more frequent and convenient. However, the potential issues and problems follow with such phenomenon. To illustrate, my personal experience is a compelling example. When I was in college, I was searching for an internship opportunity on the internet, and I accidentally fall into a fraud trap on a website, my personal information and bank account password was exposed to the hacker, and lost a lot of money during the process. Thus, this demonstrated the opinion that the internet has potential crime issues and is not safe the use. I am sure that if a young generation like me can come across danger while utilizing the internet, the previous generation can be more vulnerable when having access to it.
From what has been discussed above, we can safely draw a conclusion that the internet produces many issues because of the potential cybercrime that could occur and easy to manipulate.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- TOEFL T P O 43 Integrated Writing Task 3
- Tpo51 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
- tpo 39 65
- TPO32 integrated writing 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, thus, whereas, while, for instance, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19680851064 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03981799388 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542553191489 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2561196097 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.941176471 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1176470588 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208199497752 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626713830424 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527404489761 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110580684157 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542070268576 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.