There has been a constant drumbeat that whether the variety of tasks is associated with worker's satisfaction. Some hold the point of view that doing similar tasks fit the expectation, others stay against the viewpoint. From my perspective, I prefer having different types of tasks ad I will elaborate on my viewpoint in the following paragraphs.
Admittedly, some people may consider repeating the same thing makes the job easier and without thinking, mistakes can be prevented. However, with such kind of attitude one is unlikely to approach any achievement. Facing numerous challenges and conquering them has always been a crucial factor for human civilization to improve. As a result, maintaining the same way is not an option.
Moreover, creating different types of tasks make working interesting. The traditional way of working style is been replaced by a contemporary mindset gradually, the current generation is willing to search and try multiple career paths until finding the suitable one, unlike the previous generation stayed with one job and worked until retirement. To illustrate, the vast majority of my college partners apply for entire different professions as master's degrees. Despite learning entirely new knowledge is a challenge, most of them enjoy such a competitive situation and embrace difficulties. This proves that the process of exploring new knowledge keeps people maintaining satisfied.
In addition, career span relies on accomplishment. A sense of achievement is the priority factor when it comes to choosing a career path recently, people are more willing to choose a job that brings a sense of achievement over a position that offers more money, and with a variety of jobs in the industry, workers are more likely to stay instead of resigning to try a different job.
From what has been discussed above, we can safely draw a conclusion that having multiple options for working tasks is better and more beneficial. Because with such a strategy, the working environment will maintain positive and improve.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, in addition, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34365325077 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98035820957 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.7138817128 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0625 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134083434916 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412724228758 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522379269913 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756197245614 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619671822369 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, in addition, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34365325077 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98035820957 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.7138817128 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0625 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134083434916 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412724228758 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522379269913 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756197245614 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619671822369 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.