TPO53
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is important to improve the accessibility of the Internet and public transportation for peoples' quality of life. I grant that there are many opinions about that: however, I think that government should spend more money to improve public transportation than Internet access. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explain in the following essay.
First of all, private companies improved Internet access, so this does not need support from the government. These days many people use the Internet through laptops or smartphones in daily life. There is no denying that Internet-related companies such as Google, Amazon, Facebook, and so on are highly valued in the stock markets. This means that improving Internet access has a big business chance. These days, many Internet providers compete for their Internet access qualities, and this situation brings benefits to people without the government's support. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. When I was a freshman at university, I tried to use an Internet provider. I did not feel dissatisfaction with the services; however, the salesperson from other providers recommended changing the providers because they could provide more sophisticated services. I decided to change the services and, consequently, I could afford a more convenient Internet environment.
Next, businesses that run public transportation sometimes go bankrupt without support from the government. Not only Internet access but also public transportation is an imperative part of our lives. For public transportation, however, private companies cannot earn a lot of money compared to Internet-related companies even though they play an important role in our daily lives. When some natural disasters happen, these companies sometimes do not enough money to maintain their systems. For example, there was a big earthquake in our country. This caused huge damages to public transportations such as railroad or subway and so on. The government decided to support these companies because the damages were so big that they could not repair their systems by themselves. If the government had not supported them, we would not afford them even now.
In conclusion, I strongly think that the government should spend more money to improve Internet access. This is because improving the Internet does not need government support, and it needs more money to support public transportation companies.
- TPO48 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 60
- TPO 41 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- TPO 51 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 61
- TPO 47 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, so, for example, i feel, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45767195767 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10538854794 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510582010582 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0176694464 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7727272727 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365801423823 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115570735415 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957804034955 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282082715313 0.150856017488 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104148206547 0.0645574589148 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.