Universities should spend more money on improving facilities (like library, computer labs) than on hiring famous teachers.
Planning expenses reasonably and effectively is essential for developments of Universities. Personally, I strongly believe that hiring famous teachers is more crucial than improving facilities for universities. I feel this for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
At the beginning, famous teachers can bring lots of beneficial resources to universities, which will let students have more opportunities. Famous professors usually have connections in their own fields. Thus, they can introduce lots job positions or research opportunities to their students. My own experience is a compelling example. The last year of undergraduate study, I put lots of effort on searching for a job as a film editor. However, I found out that film companies usually hired film editors who had several years work experiences. Obviously, I was not qualified. In order to find if there were any companies that hired editor without any work experiences, I wrote an email to one of my professors for help, who was a famous documentary filmmaker. Finally, he introduced me to his friend's company which was willing to accept editor without work experiences. With his introduction, I successfully found the job that I love.
Furthermore, famous teachers can attract more excellent students to apply for the universities, which will improve the quality of students. Famous professors' reputation could let universities have more excellent students and universities will have more valuable research outputs. For instance, my friend John who had a very great performance on his academic study during high school and he got lots of offers from universities that had high rankings. However, he did not choose to go to these universities with high rankings, instead he enrolled in an average university. He explained that he chose this university was because of a famous professor in history department. When John started his undergraduate study, he kept doing research with that famous professor and he has already been a famous researcher in history field.
It is true that spend money on facilities could improve students learning experience. However, students' learning experience most depend on teachers’ performances. Thus, comparing to the benefits that hiring famous teachers can bring, it is seems less important.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that hiring famous teachers is more crucial than improving facilities for universities. This is because famous teachers can bring good resources to students, and because they can attract more excellent students.
- Universities should spend more money on improving facilities like library computer labs than on hiring famous teachers 70
- fsdfsd 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost 73
- Universities should spend more money on improving facilities like library computer labs than on hiring famous teachers 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...improve the quality of students. Famous professors reputation could let universities have ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
...ilities could improve students learning experience. However, students learning experience ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
... experience. However, students learning experience most depend on teachers’ performances. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4648241206 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14284650507 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492462311558 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9571589441 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.625 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5833333333 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252347304014 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790083684445 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097272986199 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174751063592 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650218886505 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.