University should allocate money to increase professors' salaries so as to improve the quality of education.
Recent years, there has been a heated discussion about whether the equality of education could be improved by raising salaries of professors. Spending more money on salaries of professors, in some people’s view, may undermine teacher’s zest for teaching. My perspective, contrary to these opinions, is that higher salaries could be a strong attribution to professors, thus they may make every effort to grasp at the job.
First of all, it is more appealing for new applicants which own the greater education ability. In a word, the better professors are, the higher income they want to get. There is no doubt that becoming a senior teacher should spend more time and money on their career development, thus, they forward to paying. As is shown in survey, more than a half of teachers claim that they prefer working for the college with a competitive earnings. For one thing, increase of salaries could help universities to recruit greater professors. For another thing, the greater professors could help universities to improve its education quality.
Secondly, higher income also benefits to teachers’ families. In detail, with a wealth of money collected, they can shoulder family responsibilities. Hardly can a impoverished adult introduce his family members to private health care, a quality education or regular family vacations. With a higher salary obtained, professors could easily take care of their families, thus, they will have more time to discover the shortages in teaching and upgrade soon.
Thirdly, professors given the higher salaries will have more opportunities to develop their career. For example, if a teacher earns a high income per month, he could take some courses of teaching methods. Thus, the knowledge and skills will possibly pave the way for his career development, and finally contribute to the equality of education.
Nevertheless, overestimating the importance of salaries may bring about something unfavorable. Some professors tend to ignore the processing of teaching and practicing. To avoid such an extent, universities ought to start up the investigation system which restrains the power of teacher and emphasizes the responsibility of education.
All in all, I stand for the idea that higher salaries could contribute to education equality of professors. No one wants to fight without enough money for surviving. Therefore, there is every reason to believe that universities could have more high-level professors after increasing salaries, and most of which will have further improvement in time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-18 | hapsh | 83 | view |
| 2023-05-15 | Umme Abiha | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-07 | sara.ana | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | Mohf89 | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-02 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
- Government should spend more money on environment protection than on economic 57
- It is a waste of money for governments fund to space travel or space exploration 64
- Society benefits more from works of great artists from political leaders. 90
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 90
- Technology desighed to make people's lives simpler actually makes people's livies more complicated 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'earning'?
Suggestion: earning
...king for the college with a competitive earnings. For one thing, increase of salaries co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...der family responsibilities. Hardly can a impoverished adult introduce his family...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, another thing, for example, no doubt, first of all, for another thing, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2162.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44584382872 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0008025118 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536523929471 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4383704362 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2727272727 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0454545455 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.59090909091 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24052861172 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702734923954 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538068958792 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125585365414 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540534174207 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.