Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.
There are many countries in the world which have different cultures as well as different history. It is worth exploring another country since it will broaden your horizon and enlarge your knowledge. For the method to learn about a country, people have their own preference. Some people consider that visiting museums is the best way to do that while others have other choices. Personally, I disagree with this former idea and regard traveling around the country as the best way to explore it instead of going to museums. Detailed reasons will be explored in subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, I think we need to explore the contemporary country rather than the past country at first personally. However, it is known that museums usually exhibit items, like books and images, from the past which show a country's history. Although we can know a lot by visiting museums, viewing images and reading explanations in museums can't give us a vivid show of the country nevertheless. To explain it in detail, the method I adopt to explore a city may work for exploring a country too. I like to explore a city by taking a walk around the city without plans instead of going to museums or those famous sites. Only by walking along streets, eating local dishes can we have a tangible feeling of the city. The city embraces you when you walk on its roads, smelling and hearing, which is an enjoyable experience which can’t be obtained by visiting museums. When you want to explore a country, you can drive your car down to country roads, chating with local people, which will give you a comprehensive notion about the country.
Secondly, what should be mentioned is that museums are often built by governments of countries. They store what they want to store and exhibit what they want to exhibit. Therefore, those items laid out are likely to play some specific roles, like showing the positive aspect of the country and showing how people fight through the hard period to encourage today's citizens to work hard for the future. As a consequence, what you learn from visiting museums may be partial and this problem can be supplemented by talking with local people, like taxit drivers. They collect information from every corner of the country while driving his car and sending people to the destination. I often have a valuable talk with them when taking a taxit, knowing about the latest cases and development happening in the city, which excites me very much.
To conclude, I believe that the best way to learn about a country is traveling around the country rather than going to museums.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | saba22 | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | porteghale Abiasli | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | usef | 71 | view |
| 2022-09-22 | m_aalaei | 66 | view |
- Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country 76
- For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 70
- In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 80
- When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project 90
- Beliefs about elephants 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he country as the best way to explore it instead of going to museums. Detailed re...
^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ges and reading explanations in museums cant give us a vivid show of the country nev...
^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
.... To explain it in detail, the method I adopt to explore a city may work for exploring a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, i think, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2148.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87074829932 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52136861343 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49433106576 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4501326189 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334504934476 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952783331475 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934217610283 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256075549922 0.150856017488 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112203350506 0.0645574589148 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.